Unseen Presence

And I will go a completely different direction than you, @larry, but for the same reasons. I’ve just said it elsewhere and I’ll say it again here–I’m thrilled that people are starting to re-think past placements and stand forth.

As to where we go once we leap, there are multiple options. Some of them may not bear fruit immediately–but I can…[Read more]

What fascinates me most about these posts is how the actions on the part of @a and @111error have generated (or at least had infuence) on these changes in stance/position–in the specific absence of anything that can clearly be called OSDM/Order influence.

Is THIS why they’ve disappeared for all intents and purposes? Did they know that by pulling…[Read more]

I want to quote so much of your post, Robert, and just say “YES!” to everything I quoted.

But there are some specific things I wanted to touch on and expand with my own commentary. SUCH a great post.

If this means that I’m doing Lust wrong, because I’m rejecting this narrative that I’m being handed, well, then, fuck it.

But I don’t think I…

[Read more]

This is the BIGGEST question I have right now.

Assuming the story we’ve been told is true, BOS owns the media. That means that -someone- (OSDM, the real group, some third party, SOMEONE) keeps interfering to … what, troll us? Wreak havoc for no damn reason?

Why the hell would they even do that?
It accomplishes nothing to tweak the nose of…[Read more]

Nice job. Although I don’t believe in Danny.

Well, -I- noticed it. Put it in my forum post here last night. 🙂

It could mean other actors in general, like those at the MSE.
It could very well mean there are other actors/plants still within the community.
Which, if the emails are true, is a worrisome prospect–and I’m certain that people who have suspicions of others will now start to press…[Read more]

Lots of information there, for certain. I will give Morgan the benefit of the doubt and assume the information he received is legitimate at least as far as he believes it to be.

Relevant things, as far as I see in first examination:

* Clearly already part of ‘the experience’ as of Nov. 22nd of last year. There is indication that there was…[Read more]

I’ll also bring my thought over from the Slack:

I found the action Morgan took by ‘burning’ Lia’s NDA (and her in the process) to be a sign of an individual whose tactics may not be much better than those that he considers his enemy. They were also not the only potentially problematic actions taken.

As far as I’m concerned, Lia’s story about…[Read more]

You are correct. Your desires can chain you as well.

IMO, that is up to the individual, the desire, and the strength at which someone accepts it.

All of this.

The only thing I am certain of is my current desire–to attempt to experience something new, that I have never experienced before. That desire drives me from the current -stated- agenda of the BOS towards the -stated- agenda of whoever is offering illumination.

Should that change, I am willing to make that change. Should my desire…[Read more]

It most definitely was a dig at @wanda102 saying something public. Essentially, “_I_ brought it up silently. YOU were the one who said something public.” 100% read that way.

When I read through it, it felt like @a asked some question of Lia that implied something or triggered something. “If I scared her now,” means “if what I asked her scared…[Read more]

Maybe we take everything with a grain of salt. What’s beneath it all?

I have kept that particular note in my head since we saw it. I am maintaining as open a mind as I can about everything. It is my expectation that ‘illumination’ in whatever form it takes will give me more to consider–but not to consider blindly.

So I agree wholeheartedly, @wanda102

I agree that truth, that illumination, is the vital path, at least for me. I also agree that Morgan’s motives may be entirely what he claims them to be–but the outcome remains one where he’s still hiding things, even from allies. Even if that’s NECESSARY from his point of view (and it may well be), that’s not sufficient for me.

I have written…[Read more]

I wholeheartedly believe that IF @a is telling the truth, or the truth as @a knows it anyway, AND that the calls offering illumination are from the “Illuminated Ones” (and given the word, that continues to be the most likely scenario, IMO)…then yes, that is my belief. We are being given a chance to see the other side (perhaps, even from the…[Read more]

I think that is a possible interpretation. But I can say that as I got the call, I thought the reference was specifically the BOS that was being called a con.

It is certainly possible that my belief at that time was erroneous.

I’ve got a little more of it.

Same woman. Same ‘recorded message’ feel.

“They talk and they talk and they talk. But should you be listening? It’s a con. They lie, they distort the path. I hope your desire to be illuminated remains strong. Goodbye.”

The timing was most definitely aimed at disrupting the discussion by @lilmsfancpants and the Red…[Read more]

That is EXACTLY the same call I got.

The voice was definitely female–but it sounded like it was being played through some electronic system. She started by saying “You have one minute to decide.” Then came a phrase that was similar to what was posted above (but I frankly missed a little as I was literally standing outside and shaking from the…[Read more]

I have too many thoughts to effectively describe them at this moment. Other than to say it is astonishing how little I believe in coincidences today.

I’ll add more when I can qualitatively speak.