Chelsea

@chelsea As a matter of fact, I do.

@erisbonn @chelsea I interpreted the discussion about truth being utilized as a weapon as a direct reference to Morgan’s December 11 “announcement” yesterday.

Which means one of two things –

1) Morgan has been lying a lot. And when he told the truth about December 11, we’re now at a disadvantage because it instills doubt, and encourages us to…[Read more]

@chelsea For real.

The moment when you realize he’s hung up…bahahahahaaa!!! Mason & his troll flirting, I swear.

As far as why @chelsea makes him sad, the only thing I can think of is she reminds him of Joyce?? Or that somehow she hasn’t given him the reaction he was looking for/expecting in their encounters??

Very possible, @chelsea. Andy specifically mentioning he’s going to be in NoHo doesn’t seem like an idle slip up. For what it’s worth he also said meetings, plural, if I’m reading right. How many of us live in NoHo specifically? Myself, Brad, Buz (RIP,) Max Z, and Morgan? Am I forgetting anyone?

@chelsea

So, why does Morgan think that Cristen has info that no one else has?

I can assure you I don’t know anything beyond what we all share. Maybe that’s the point? He asked me something I couldn’t understand and then hung up because my answer was unsatisfactory. It stung. The idea of @111error needing something from me that I am unabl…[Read more]

@russell I have full respect for your interpretation, as always. I find it difficult, with Mason as well as Sabrina to a lesser degree, to sift out the truth amongst the lies. I think @chelsea’s analysis of our past interactions with Mason may be beneficial in this regard, but as I see it now, I’d want to know what exactly he’s saving the world f…[Read more]

@chelsea Was it attributed to the author, or the character?

@chelsea this almost reinforces the reading of that to

“I pledge my desire for and ” – we’ve been given freedom as we’ve made choices with direct consequences.. which have ended in Their Sacrifice.

@chelsea I’m assuming, based on her questions, that she was trying to collect data on me. So my use to Briarberg would be similar to my use to OSDM – my emotional index.

This is picking up something that @chelsea touched upon above, but: have we ever definitively learned that the language about pledging oneself to their sacrifice and freedom was OSDM?

I know I always assumed it was, particularly when Jacob was so, um, forceful about it at the iConfidant meeting. But tonight’s calls definitely seem to frame that i…[Read more]

@chelsea We heard that specific phrase at the iConfidant meet and greet too. So @russell, you’re not actually off topic. Sacrifice was also mentioned in the Encroaching Dark email.

@chelsea Agreed. Weren’t we all told something similar at the end of Registration?

Jaime from Briarberg called whilst I was drinking with @chelsea.

How did I feel about the recent activities?

“I was really rather disturbed by Mr. Silver’s actions.”

Did I have more clarity following these recent events?

“Yes, I do have more clarity actually. These events, in combination with the meeting you hosted, has provided me with fa…[Read more]

@kortneydarling, in another thread I mentioned that it would be possible participants might be contacted for help as Mason continues his “work” and moves through the list. If all this data on us is out there, then who knows who is able to reach each and everyone one of us at any time?

To me, the odd thing is that she would give @mike any…[Read more]

I think @mike is immensely overqualified for the body dumping and bleach scrubbing that Mason needs help with. Otis is an interesting choice though, @chelsea. His relationship with his current employers seems pretty tenuous, to say the least. Whoever it is, I have a feeling we’ll see them guest star in one of Mason’s snuff films sooner rather than later.

I really like the idea of option 3, but don’t really think it lines up with Briarberg’s actions to this point. I can sort of see a scenario where it all points to them being the cleaner wing of OSDM, but it feels like a reach. And if Briarberg is really a wing of OSDM, that has even bigger implications for BOS than when we realized Mason had been…[Read more]

@chelsea Oooooooooooooooooh.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH.

Option 3. Yes. After all, a clean-up crew’s job could technically be articulated as getting people “out” of the OSDM, couldn’t it?

As for OSDM being a charity, I think that might be a misread. Nobody said they were giving out money to be nice.

What does OSDM do? They collect data. What to do…[Read more]

@chelsea I’m also still stuck as to why the OSDM is doing the whole charity gig. Because I think we all know that’s got to be some kind of bullshit, right? Mason’s sabotaging that but is it at his own behest? I guess we have to ask what Mason/Briarberg gets out of 91 deaths?

Yeah @chelsea, I’m absolutely leaning towards option 3 right now.