• Unseen Presence replied to the topic Part 2 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago

    Perhaps it’s because I -don’t- have any clear emotional feelings for any of these people in videos today, but I can’t shake the feeling that there’s still something hidden from us here.

    First, I agree with you @kevin. The idea of ‘altruistic’ seems off-kilter with the tone of both videos. I suppose that really does make me end up over somewhere…[Read more]

  • I’m more than a little confused about your friend blowing the conversation off that way. If he knows what it was about, why not just tell you? Because right now, all it’s doing is making you suspicious.

    And wow, it really does make one begin to contemplate every random thing that happens over the course of a day as potentially something that has…[Read more]

  • True enough. But I came out of the quiet just in time for all the paranoia, distrust, chaos of the past two weeks. As such, it was just surprising that she was as chipper and genial and happy as she was. We joked around about email addresses, about the forums a little bit. It was just surprisingly UP. That’s all.

  • Here’s my call, also about a +1.

    Call came in 9:21 PM. Woman identified herself as “S (something)” from “(something)” — I was at an improv group meeting like every Monday and literally couldn’t hear her over the people in the group doing whatever game it was. So I leaped outside and asked her to repeat.

    She said she was from The Lust Experience…[Read more]

  • Not -necessarily- true. Like any good safe house, if they don’t know WHERE you are and you’re off the grid, you -can- still disappear.

    It just doesn’t allow you to do anything else once you go that route.

  • Maybe we should start using their own tactics against them. Snatch people away. Hide them. Offer sanctuary in non-obvious places. Use codes. Get our own burner phones. Etc.

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago

    I don’t think of corrupted as being “ruined” in this case either.

    I meant only that there are people, like me, who are only now learning what’s been going on and have not yet been “influenced” by all of the various people/organizations involved. Corrupted in this case meant only that the interactions/events you all have been part of put you in a…[Read more]

  • I think this idea makes the most sense out of everything. It really DOES feel like it’s all just multiple variations on the same theme. Divide, conquer, distract.

    It does beg the following question, however:

    Assume your theory is correct.

    Why make it clear RIGHT NOW that that’s what they’re doing? They could have continued the charade for a…[Read more]

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago

    @coryphella: At this point in this thing we all have secrets.

    There are some of us who don’t, at least not yet. Or at least, not regarding the Lust experience, OSDM or anything else of the kind. I don’t know if that helps or hurts, but it means we’re at least currently unsullied/uncorrupted.

  • I would be stunned if this did not reference the upcoming event.

    It’s also worth noting that in many ways, they have already begun ‘creating a paradox of identity’, as we’re now debating exactly who is who, who is real, who is in charge.

    I suspect that by the time we get to the actual event, it may all be completely unspooled, leaving us with…[Read more]

  • I personally expect to see evidence they have appear very soon.

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic Mason live on FB 11/2 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago

    As someone who doesn’t have either of those emotional ties, I think your examination of the video is spot on, @bcbishop. The framing in the actual video is deliberate–a specific, staged way to guarantee that we get both Erika and Morgan in the shot.

    You only do that if you’re intending to show “I (Morgan) was the one recording this,…[Read more]

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic Mason live on FB 11/2 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago

    Does anyone else feel like some of what Erika is talking about may be what -we- are about to experience?

    Could it be that not!Mason is pulling up videos that are going to give us either info/warning/ideas of what is to come in a few weeks?

    It was one of the first thoughts I had when I could finally listen to it.

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic Mason live on FB 11/2 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago

    This is something I keep coming back to as well.

    If EVERYTHING is part of OSDM, then it’s ALL just data. Okay, fine.

    But now we know that. Now many of you have had the rug pulled out from under you over and over (for some f you, over two years of experiences).

    It has to be reaching critical mass, critical disbelief levels. If not!Mason suddenly…[Read more]

  • Unseen Presence replied to the topic FB Post – 11/2 in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago

    LIES

  • Unseen Presence changed their profile picture 7 years ago

  • It is certainly a possibility.

    If we can take the ouroboros image as having any relevance, we are circling back to the beginning again in SOME fashion. Perhaps it’s to reset and replay in some fashion–but you’re all so cynical at this point (and rightfully so given the video) that such seems unlikely to work.

    But perhaps the circling back is to…[Read more]

  • I’ve been contemplating something all day now.

    Anointment is coming next month. OSDM wants to show us how they are NOT the ‘crazy conspiracy’ we have become to believe they are. But they also want us to see them and be ready for complete submission (from the event site). Everything we’ve seen from them suggests (or at least, they WANT us to…[Read more]

  • I wish such technology actually existed, but I remain highly suspicious in the idea of “mind control” under any circumstance, much less wirelessly.

    I think your theory is interesting, but barring seeing it in action myself, I think it’s at the edge of possible but not terribly probable.

    Then again, I’m quite aware that I don’t have the history…[Read more]

  • @bcbishop

    I both agree and disagree with your statements.

    Yes, it is often the case that “all you can control is how you respond to events. You cannot control them directly.”

    But I also believe that such a stance can often be an excuse for tossing away responsibility for something one has done. I believe it can be a way of abdicating power or…[Read more]

  • Load More