Unseen Presence

Okay. During a time of cleansing
* likely right now or just past, perhaps during a transformation or important religious time for the OSDM

the assigned Clockmaker has to destroy all electronic media from members and start “The Abstention Protocol”
* likely exactly that–abstain from using media. So current media black-out.

until ‘relegation’ can…[Read more]

Looking at his old interviews, I am definitely contemplating that Noah has been manipulating everyone, all along, us and the OSDM and the BOS and his System 5. That there was never a rebellious, petulant kid–but only an act of such, no different than the theatre of the MSE.

I think literally -everyone- got played by a man coming into his prime.…[Read more]

Who are the two with initials? Making sure I’m clear.

Or anyone Australian. British. Could it mean Morgan? I’m not clear who “they” is yet.

There are burns? You might want to try heating the paper up, too.

Who IS the “They” here?

Next drop had better be on ANY other day but Thursday. 🙂

Wholeheartedly agree that -overall-, all the symbology and potential ramifications of such that @blondie put together is of the most significant interest to me.

But then again, if individual actions are what will ultimately matter–if those actions also include choosing/picking/making sides, I expect them to continue to exist and matter as well.

That’s a good point.

But at the same time, if it’s someone -new-, then:

A) That means we have to start all over again with some new ‘group’, and at this point I feel like most people would be so suspicious of them that it’d be hard to get them (whomever they are) to gain any traction

B) They’re taking a tremendous risk using the name OSDM if…[Read more]

I don’t have the experience to know what is the “OSDM” MO–but I think the outcome of the puzzle would be REALLY strange if it was anything other than OSDM proselytization. I mean, I guess it -could- be yet another step from the resistance–but why not just make that CLEAR?

Is there anyone running around who would be easily fooled by that…[Read more]

@larry – Note that I put the words ‘immersive theatre’ in quotes, yes? That was meant to imply exactly what you just said. If I were convinced it was -entirely- and -only- immersive theatre, my internal debate on agency would be not far less of a conflict internally.

I keep thinking about agency. It’s all I’ve been thinking about over this weekend (partly because I’ve been sick and without a voice and when you CAN’T speak….you want to all the more.) It’s also been much on my mind right now for a number of different reasons in my own creative endeavors.

But in the context of Lust, I’m really contemplating…[Read more]

I agree, @coryphella, that the MSE seems to be more complicated than Larry’s version wants it to be. And every moment, I get more convinced that our choices may be the ONLY ultimate answer to everything that’s going on.

I keep going back to the most recent interview, as I feel like amongst anything else it might be, it’s either preparation or a…[Read more]

Thoughts on the periscope:

1. I appreciate the breakdown of events for both experiences, although I think some of your ideas have the potential to be speculative rather than certain. But I definitely appreciate it.

2. For what it’s worth, we do not -actually- know what DLB is referencing when he got upset about what he was seeing in the most…[Read more]

Having not been there, I can only speculate on what might have pissed anyone off.

Obviously, something might have been done that was for the benefit of upsetting the OSDM–but those participants who were there couldn’t or didn’t see it. If that’s the case, I suspect we’ll eventually get more info leaked that will fill in that hole.

So let’s…[Read more]

At this point, it’s probably fair to assume WHY is always going to be my go-to question.

WHY did these get sent? That’s the biggest question, I think, of all. If we can understand the motivation, we can maybe get a better sense of what to do with them.

Option 1: Sent by DLB/CS themselves. If that’s the case, then they’re either trying to leak…[Read more]

Okay, so we’ve discussed the pages, people have posted the images that we have access to (as far as I know) and what is altered in them. All of that’s gone on the forums.

So why delete the comment NOW? That cat is out of the bag, as it were.

Is it the connection of those pages from the MSE to the -actual- book? Why would that be the important…[Read more]

You know, I -think- my roommate’s conversation with Noah had both some similarity and some differences to this breakdown. She’s out of town until tomorrow but I’ll ask her when she gets back and post up her response if I think it’s either similar enough or different enough to add any details/invoke any discussion.

First, I’ll apologize if I made it sound like Taye was the only one who could/should be upset. Was NOT my intention at all. I only said Taye because it was him who Cecilia specifically asked. I get that y’all are supposed to be a team.

Second, this is what I meant by suggesting elsewhere that maybe the ONLY answer that exists is whatever Generic…[Read more]

I think the statement “stop giving them a platform” is worthy intel to have gotten. It defines her in relation to them–which we can then debate the truth of, certainly. But her request was strange and I was as curious as Cristen was. Now we at least got a potential answer as to why she wanted to see them.

Is it possible she was lying, etc.?…[Read more]

You’ve nailed it on the head.

There’s three choices, really, right?

DLB/CS are in charge and Cecilia is off-script somehow.
Cecilia is in charge (or at least among the THEM in charge. Investors/whatever) and DLB/CS are off-script somehow.
Everything remains exactly as it should be and -whatever- conflict may be rising between the creators and…[Read more]