Tagged: 90013, phone call
This topic has 188 replies, 54 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 10 months ago by Julie R Goldstein.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:27 am #4460
Cristen
ParticipantMorning all,
I just received a call from a woman who asked if I was a leader (totally am yep) and said the following:
Paraphrasing: “Go to the public and select a person and make them known to us. Give us their full name and phone number. Bring just one.”
I suppose this is where we choose a representative to go to 90013 tonight. I sure hope I understood that properly, it was my first go-round.
So what do we want to do? Take a vote? Have people throw themselves at my mercy to see who I put up on the chopping block? I’ll want to email them the info.
-
This topic was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
Cristen.
-
This topic was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:31 am #4461
Mike
ParticipantHere we go!
Interesting that she said “bring”. It sounds like it’s you plus….ONE (ha!)?
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:32 am #4463
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantOooh, throw em to the wolves mommy!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:32 am #4464
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:34 am #4466
Anonymous
InactiveI don’t envy your position. Choose wisely!
Everyone should post here if they are free today to go do this and @wanda102 can pick someone.
I am free, but also had plenty of attention last year and think someone else should be picked.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:35 am #4467
monkeymuffin333
ParticipantI can be free if you ignore the crying from the trunk of my car.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:36 am #4469
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantI am also available.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:36 am #4470
Bryan Bishop
Participant“Give us their name and phone number.”
They have all of our names and phone numbers. Do they want to recruit somebody from the actual public?
Congrats @wanda102!!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:37 am #4471
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantOh dang! If it’s a night thing I’m able to join and then report back to the loser party after. I should be out of the office around 6-6:30.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:37 am #4472
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:39 am #4473
Mike
ParticipantDo they want to recruit somebody from the actual public?
How awkward would that be? “Excuse me sir/miss…may I have your phone number and name? I need to give it to…well…I don’t know who…and we’re going to go to…um..I don’t know where.”
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:39 am #4474
M.
ParticipantAvailable too. I just need time to be able to drive into LA.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:39 am #4475
Megan
ParticipantIf it’s actual public I have suggestions
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:40 am #4476
Nosnevets
ParticipantThrowing my hat in the ring. I’ve got unfinished business.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:41 am #4477
Anonymous
InactivePick someone from the Losers Club! Winners got all the fun last time.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:41 am #4478
Chelsea
ParticipantAlso free!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:42 am #4479
M.
ParticipantI’m going to add, I think they want you to bring someone outside of us or they wouldn’t have used the word “public.” I think if it were one of us, the word community would have been used. Public could be someone you know but who isn’t involved in Lust. I have a lot of friends and family who are aware of what I’m involved in but aren’t involved. Perhaps one of them could be an option for you?
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:42 am #4480
Kyle Bown
ParticipantThey said public specifically? Sounds like it means a civilian to me. Someone not already in the game. That is also something that may require leadership. Getting the lot of us to volunteer for this is easy, getting someone not in our crazy house may take a bit more work.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:43 am #4481
Anonymous
InactiveI’m throwing @winstonsmith’s hat into the ring, as I work in Orange County and he can be available much, much sooner than I would be. Also, he’s one of those nifty loser people and he’s fun at parties.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:58 am #4507
Winston Smith
Participant@kipsie You take that back. I am *not* fun at parties! I am available, but other people are far more deserving of the opportunity.
Let @thebuz go, he hasn’t strangled anyone in months, and he’s probably getting antsy about it. I can hardly think of someone more strangle-worthy than Noah. He says he’s already dead anyway, let’s put that to the test and see how dead he really is.
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:44 am #4483
M.
ParticipantPick someone from the Losers Club! Winners got all the fun last time.
@thebuz I’m trying to figure out how all the winners got all the fun last time but you’re in what has been named the losers group?
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:44 am #4484
Cristen
ParticipantI am writing everyone’s name down and I figure I will get back in touch via email by about 1pm so keep your names coming! I’ll do a random draw unless there’s a beautiful sob story or a massive consensus that one particular person should go. ?
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:45 am #4485
Julie R Goldstein
ParticipantI’m around today myself. I’m a winner, so I won’t be joining those losers at their little get together.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:46 am #4486
Mike
ParticipantJust remember, this could be a Noah test. If he sees you not “taking it” and “caring” about what others think, it may come back to bite ya 😉
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:47 am #4487
Russell
ParticipantI like the idea of community input, but personally I believe the final decision should rest with @wanda102, as instructed. After all, Cristen’s decision may be a way for the person arranging this meeting to learn a little bit about her.
(Sorry Cristen… not trying to make you paranoid or anything, but it seems you have eyes on you right now!)That being said, I can be available. But… the decision is Cristen’s.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:47 am #4488
Cristen
ParticipantShoot do we really think it’s a member of the public? I can ask a non-Lust friend I suppose. There wasn’t an option for clarification on the call, which is to be expected but kinda a drag. She definitely said “public,” yes. “Go to the public.”
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:48 am #4490
Anonymous
Inactive@michelle Referring to Bryan and Lia and the hotel hooker conference.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:48 am #4491
Megan
ParticipantYes this is public. They would have said community otherwise.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:49 am #4492
Anonymous
Inactive@wanda102 I think they want you to bring a friend not in this world along with yourself.
More than likely going to test your boundaries.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:50 am #4493
Cristen
Participant@coryphella I just wonder how that works in the scheme of things. Sending someone who has no idea what they’re doing down there. Hmph.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:51 am #4494
Nicole Mae
Participantmaybe they don’t consider “Losers” party of a ‘Community’.
also, I don’t see Noah as the kind of guy that uses word like ‘Community’.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:52 am #4495
Mustafa Said
ParticipantCongrats and good luck!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:52 am #4497
M.
Participant@wanda102 I think this is a test to see if you are a true leader and not someone who will say she is just to get a meeting. I firmly believe they are wanting someone who isn’t involved. I believe this so strongly that I am pulling my name out of the hat. I wouldn’t want to be in that meeting if it were a fuck up. Because both of would be blamed for not thinking it through. As I said in my previous post, they would have said community not public. Community is a huge word among us. It’s not said lightly. I think you need to bring someone not involved in Lust.
@thebuz… Ha! My dumbass was thinking about Tension. :/ Sorry about that.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:53 am #4498
Jeremy
ParticipantGive me a few hours notice and I’ll come down from SLO! (I know, wishful thinking)
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:53 am #4499
Lia
ParticipantLet’s not forget all the “maybes” as well! This could be an opportunity to prove yourself!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:53 am #4500
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:53 am #4501
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantI’d suggest have two people at the ready. Someone from the community here that is available, and a friend of yours not participating in this already. Send them one and if they come back saying that’s not what they meant have the other option at the ready right away.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:55 am #4503
Megan
ParticipantI agree that this is a test of YOU and your boundaries. If that isn’t what they meant they will tell you. You will get pushed in this experience maybe outside of your comfort zone
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:56 am #4504
Megan
ParticipantAlso I think we shouldn’t assume every interaction is Noah…he is a person involved but not the only one
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:57 am #4505
Cristen
ParticipantGet at me @meghanmayhem!
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:57 am #4506
Anonymous
InactiveI agree with @coryphella. We always refer to ourselves as a community. Specific use of the word public vs community . . . Nothing is random.
-
March 30, 2017 at 9:58 am #4508
Cristen
ParticipantRunning out of time. Someone PM me full name and phone number or they move on. ✌️
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:00 am #4509
Twan Intarathuch
ParticipantI’m agree with the sentiment that this is a “Test” for your leadership abilities, but the rebel in me wants to say, fuck tests. Do what you want. If you want to recruit a rando, do it! If you want to draw names in a hat, cool!. If you don’t want to do anything, fuck it…. see what they do. You’re not a lab rat.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:03 am #4510
Jackie
ParticipantPLEASE PICK ME. I LIVE IN RIVERSIDE AND WOULD DIE TO GO.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:06 am #4511
Cristen
ParticipantOk, they clarified that it WAS in community and then gave me 15 minutes to pick someone and I didn’t get info from anyone quickly enough so in my last minute rush I popped over to Slack and took what I genuinely hope was @julierei’s correct info from her profile. That was intense. Do me proud, Jules.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:06 am #4512
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:07 am #4513
Anonymous
Inactive@theladyj As someone that spent her first 29 years in the 951, I know this feel. Escape Riverside while you still can. (Good luck!)
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:07 am #4514
Bryan Bishop
ParticipantLeaders are often forced to do the unpopular thing. Choose wisely, @wanda102. 🙂
“Only the active move forward.”
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:08 am #4515
Anonymous
InactiveGood thing you didn’t listen to me. That could have been interesting ?
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:09 am #4516
Brian E
ParticipantI’m available in the Losers Club, and will be in that area later today. @wanda102
That said if they said “public”, I’d think that doesn’t mean us. I’d suggest head downtown with a friend not involved with Lust, maybe someone who was involved in Tension, but not on the forums, and dressed business casual of course, ready for anything.
Def make a periscope account, so you can share the news later, whatever that might be.
Good luck!
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:09 am #4517
Twan Intarathuch
Participant@wanda102
Good luck tonight! -
March 30, 2017 at 10:09 am #4518
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:12 am #4519
monkeymuffin333
ParticipantGood luck! Take notes. Periscope if you can! ^______^
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:14 am #4520
Cristen
Participant@michelle fantastic question that I don’t yet know the answer to. I suppose I could’ve chosen myself, but leaders delegate responsibility, no?
@bcbishop great point, being new to the community and forced to make a quick choice like, that I picked @julierei knowing that she is active and having spoken with her several times. It’s a cruel choice but that’s the nature of this thing I suppose. -
March 30, 2017 at 10:15 am #4521
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:17 am #4522
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:18 am #4523
Julie R Goldstein
Participant@wanda102 – Morituri Te Salutant!
My periscope is ‘JulieRei’. I’ll do what I can.
Time to start staring at my phone.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:19 am #4525
Anonymous
InactiveWell shit if someone like @julierei who’s had one on ones before can be picked that means @kasch, me, and @electrichippo should be eligible again in the future! Huzzah!
Good luck you two.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:21 am #4527
Brian E
Participant@wanda102 That’s an excellent choice, I’ve met her as well @julierei is a huge supporter and she is also good with periscope, and social media. So she’ll be able to get the word out to the rest of us quickly.
Perhaps periscope the interaction unless your asked to stop, I have a feeling will all be watching. I’ll be at Tiki No in North Hollywood for Losers Club tonight.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:21 am #4528
Brad Ruwe
Participant“There ain’t no love for the losers.
Noah don’t care ’bout me.
They got calls to make, they got plots to feed
They won’t give me their time for free.” -
March 30, 2017 at 10:28 am #4530
Cristen
ParticipantTo be fair @thebuz I wasn’t aware that Julie had had one on ones before just that she had gone through Tension, and does a lot of community social outreach. She comes on my radar a lot and has always been friendly so she’s the first person who came to mind when I was pressed to make a quick choice. No malintention.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:34 am #4531
Anonymous
InactiveOh I know, she just had a one on one just a bit ago was all I was saying, which opens the door for some of us! It was your choice to make! 🙂
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:36 am #4533
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:43 am #4534
Cristen
Participant@thebuz oh the DLB thing. I saw it more as he took advantage of the opportunity presented by her being at the same location more than a planned one on one. But hey, decisions were made. We all live with it, and wait for what’s next.
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:44 am #4535
Dawson
ParticipantGood Luck!
BTW at what point did we give our phone number out. I didn’t go through Tension, and I don’t remember giving a phone number during registration for Lust. Did I miss something?
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:46 am #4536
Lawrence Meyers
ParticipantExcellent choice
Now, can someone let me out of monkeymuffins trunk please?
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:56 am #4537
Anonymous
InactiveWow that all happened so fast! Interesting how they gave you such a small window of time to pick. Was going to volunteer but I guess sleeping in was a poor decision today. Hahaha. Nicely done though! @wanda102 great job just taking control and making a spilt decision. Can’t wait to see the periscope!
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:00 am #4538
monkeymuffin333
Participant*reluctantly pops open the trunk of her car and waves as @larry scampers away*
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:02 am #4539
Chris
Participant@dawsonc no you’re right. For those of us who went through Tension/Ascension we did give up a lot more personal information to the OSDM. Right now email is their only way to contact anyone new aside from those who were judged as worthy in Noah and Sarah’s eyes who were then asked to send more info, which is probably why no one who is new to the community has gotten a call yet. Until now.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:05 am #4542
Sean
Moderator@macbethinabathtub – I wouldn’t be so sure. Half the people on this site have personal data in a public enough place that it’s only a search or two away
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:06 am #4543
Cristen
ParticipantThanks all, snap decisions are snap decisions for a reason. I made a good one tho, we’ll be alright.
Also hi I’m Cristen for those of you who were wondering who on Earth is this person who’s CLEARLY drunk with power at 10am. I’m 5’11”, I enjoy cats and lifting weights and I have met fewer than 1% of you in person at this time. These are exciting times. ?
@thebuz please don’t uninvite me to Losers night I might need a drink.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:06 am #4544
Lawrence Meyers
ParticipantMay I have my clothes back, please, MonkeyMuffin?
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:09 am #4546
Cristen
Participant@thegilded and @macbethinabathtub to clarify on my end I am new but had emailed and received a response severally days later asking for my phone number, before this call.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:11 am #4547
Anonymous
Inactive@wanda102 Why on earth would I do that?!?
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:13 am #4548
Cristen
Participant@thebuz lol because I was on the no contact/nope list but then today happened and I was drunk with power. But you know what I don’t think I get to go on the meet with Julie so I’m still a loser it counts. ?
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:16 am #4549
Megan
ParticipantCan I please say something about the newbies vs. people who have had interactions thing?
I am ALL FOR new people getting interactions, seriously. I fully support this.
However.
It’s a new year and a new game. We love this too, and also want to partake. Shit we’ve been waiting too, and many of us had a hand in “building” this. I’m not averse to the older generation also getting interactions. Last year, there were people who got lots of interactions and people who got none. It’s not a “fair” thing. It’s a story, again, it’s not about what anyone GETS, it’s about the story we all experience.There will *also* be reasons why some people are chosen for experiences that will seem unfair but are COMPLETELY logical when considered from other points of view. Fairness is never the only reason anyone gets chosen, and as time goes on it may not even be a main reason someone gets chosen. We are all in this together.
So, go @julierei, and @wanda102! Have a blast, or…get your hearts broken, since this isn’t a warm and fuzzy thing. 😉
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:17 am #4550
monkeymuffin333
ParticipantSigh *Pelts @larry with a garbage bag of his belongings*. You’re very little to no fun.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:18 am #4551
Chris
ParticipantExactly @wanda102, you were judged worthy. And I’m sure Noah sees that his faith in you was not unfounded. As you said, a boss delegates. Why walk into a risky situation when you can send someone else? You made a great choice that ensures we all stay informed– though they might be a tad dissappointed since they already have such a clean set of @julierei’s fingerprints. I think the System has big plans for you.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:20 am #4552
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:22 am #4553
Julie R Goldstein
Participant@macbethinabathtub – I’m on the winners list.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:24 am #4554
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:27 am #4555
thehazelverse
ParticipantCan’t wait to hear yet another account from J dawg.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:35 am #4556
thehazelverse
ParticipantP.s- It’s super obvious to me that by telling her to share it with the public, they meant for her not to keep it to her self, but to post on the forum.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:36 am #4557
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantTotally cool with the decision, finding it funny that the “winners” are getting all the fun. If they want to foster lust in the “losers” wanting interactions, they’re def on the right track. J Rei is a badass and look forward to hearing about her evening!
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:38 am #4558
thehazelverse
ParticipantI don’t think it was on purpose. It was totally a fluke that Cristen chose the way she did.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:38 am #4559
Meghan Mayhem
Participant@nothenrygale Except that it wasn’t Lust who chose @julierei, it was @wanda102. The fact that Julie is from the “Winners” was just happenstance.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:41 am #4560
Kyle Bown
Participant@meghanmayhem I think @nothenrygale was just saying that what her status via email was may affect the meeting itself and how it goes.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:42 am #4561
thehazelverse
ParticipantThat’s not how it reads, but I agree that her status will impact the meeting.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:44 am #4562
Kevin
Participant@macbethinabathtub was the one who brought up how it might affect the meeting.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:45 am #4563
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantEven though this was her decision, it did play into the trend so far of “winners” being picked. I’m sure OSDM knows that FOMO is a thing and that does foster “lust” for attention. I do get the feeling the interaction tonight will change depending on who shows up. And given @julierei’s past run-in’s with the OSDM I’m sure tonight will be a doozy.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:46 am #4564
Anonymous
InactiveI’ll just be sitting here with popcorn, wondering when those fingerprints are going to bite @julierei in the ass…
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:48 am #4565
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantYou and me both @kipsie.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:49 am #4566
thehazelverse
ParticipantThat gif is a gift.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:53 am #4567
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@julierei I’m still waiting to hear your interpretation of “He’s squishy”.
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:54 am #4568
Anonymous
InactiveGo Winners Club! Good luck tonight, guys!
-
March 30, 2017 at 11:59 am #4570
Chris
ParticipantThank you @kevin. And exactly @nothenrygale, that’s one of the reasons why I’m so excited that it’s @julierei. We’ve been waiting for months for those fingerprints to pay off, I want answers!
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
Chris.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:00 pm #4572
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:01 pm #4573
thehazelverse
ParticipantTrying to make snap decisions on the forum brings me back to dial up.
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:12 pm #4577
Andrew Kasch
ParticipantLast year, the “interaction jealousy” thing was the low-point of Tension. So my best advice for LUST is to just relax, be present and go with the flow. Let the chips fall where they may. Everyone wants shit to happen to them and be fucked with (it’s what we live for) but if you try and force it, you’re just gonna be frustrated. The best things happen when you aren’t expecting them.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
Andrew Kasch.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:17 pm #4579
Anonymous
InactiveI think a couple of wise sages said it better than I ever could:
Be excellent to each other.
Party on, doods.But seriously, we’re literally all in this together. Support each other and the community, your time to shine will surely come.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:11 pm #4609
Lukas L
Participant@kipsie @nosnevets Looks like we got another one for team Wyld Stallyns.
“Be Excellent to each other!”
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:19 pm #4580
Briana
ParticipantOh my goodness, I can’t wait to see what happens tonight.
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:27 pm #4581
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:43 pm #4589
Andrew Kasch
Participant@kipsie This one is for you…
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:46 pm #4590
Anonymous
Inactive@kasch I am shaking at my desk with silent laughter and I’m pretty sure my coworkers think I’m having a seizure…
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:46 pm #4591
-
March 30, 2017 at 12:54 pm #4593
Daniel
ParticipantOH damnnn. I miss one day and stuffs already happening. I’m excited to see what ends up happening tho
-
March 30, 2017 at 1:05 pm #4599
Gabrielle Jewell
ParticipantAs for anyone who is severely disappointed on not getting one on one interaction – if you’re really that starved for affection I’ll set up a Hug Party when this is all over and everyone is allowed to come and hug whomever, but it is only one hug per person and entry fee is being nice to your fellow Lusters. (I haven’t been on the forums that much, is that what we’re calling ourselves?)
Anyway, best of luck today @julierei !
-
March 30, 2017 at 1:09 pm #4601
monkeymuffin333
Participant@gabzilla. CUDDLE PUDDLE IN ONESIES! I endorse this.
-
March 30, 2017 at 1:40 pm #4604
-
March 30, 2017 at 1:59 pm #4606
Gabrielle Jewell
Participant@jay956 I need to look up this episode in order to understand how I should feel about this………
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:23 pm #4612
Julie R Goldstein
ParticipantUPDATE: Just got a call. It’s going down at 4:15pm.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:51 pm #4624
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:27 pm #4613
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantBest of luck JR! YOU GOT THIS.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:30 pm #4614
Mustafa Said
Participant@julierei I’d be a bit skeptical of the time…I remember that @bcbishop and @lilmsfancpants were originally given a time for their event but then it was changed.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:44 pm #4618
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@julierei NITRILE GLOVES.
Oh, and “squishy” was explained to me. 🙂
Thank you.-
March 30, 2017 at 2:45 pm #4619
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:47 pm #4620
Meghan Mayhem
Participant@larry It’s a liiittle late for her to be worrying about fingerprints.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:49 pm #4622
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@meghanmayhem Are you trying to make me cry?
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:47 pm #4621
Masomoment
ParticipantGoodluck tonight you guys. Adding you both on periscope now.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:49 pm #4623
Meghan Mayhem
Participant@larry I mean, usually?
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:53 pm #4625
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@meghanmayhem Apparently I’m squishy. So be careful with that shit.
And Julie should wear nitrile gloves because Noah is a horse’s ass and she may need to touch him.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:55 pm #4626
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@russell Let’s start a Squishy Club.
I’ll call you Russell.
-
March 30, 2017 at 2:55 pm #4627
-
March 30, 2017 at 3:27 pm #4637
-
March 30, 2017 at 3:31 pm #4642
Anonymous
InactiveGo @julierei!!!
-
March 30, 2017 at 3:56 pm #4645
Nicole Mae
ParticipantIT’S GOING DOWNNNNN. *heavy breathing*
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:02 pm #4646
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:23 pm #4649
Tucker Barkley
ParticipantCant wait to watch! Youre going to kill it @julierei
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:30 pm #4651
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantGO JULIE GO!!!
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:30 pm #4652
Tucker Barkley
ParticipantThe last bookstore is the post from facebook! go get em @julierei
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:33 pm #4653
Nicole Mae
ParticipantIs there anything written on that fire extinguisher tag? it looks out of place in such an otherwise artful photo…
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:36 pm #4654
Anonymous
Inactive@maenicole As far as I can zoom in, it looks like pretty standard extinguisher labeling.
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:44 pm #4655
Brad Ruwe
ParticipantDid her periscope cut out for anyone else?
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:45 pm #4656
Mustafa Said
ParticipantIt did for me. Hoping she goes back live soon.
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:47 pm #4658
thehazelverse
Participantlink?
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:47 pm #4659
Lukas L
ParticipantMine is down as well
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:49 pm #4660
Nicole Mae
Participantcan someone provide a link to her periscope channel
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:52 pm #4661
Anonymous
Inactive@maenicole Search for “JulieRei” on Periscope. You’ll find her.
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:52 pm #4662
Anonymous
InactiveGood luck! Why is my breathing shallow and heart beating a little too fast?
-
March 30, 2017 at 4:57 pm #4663
thehazelverse
ParticipantFalse. Searched and found nothing.
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:00 pm #4664
Anonymous
Inactive -
March 30, 2017 at 5:05 pm #4665
thehazelverse
ParticipantAw, thanks C. Just saw this 🙂
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:06 pm #4666
Kyle Bown
Participant-
March 30, 2017 at 5:10 pm #4668
Alejandra Acosta
ParticipantI think we need a new thread for this
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:12 pm #4670
Kyle Bown
ParticipantBasically, it’s an article discussing the four ways humans may evolve in the future.
1. They won’t. human evolution is dead because there is interbreeding and no isolated populations.
2. We continue to do so naturally through sexual selection, viruses, etc.
3. We do, but it’s through electronic augmentation, genetic manipulation, etc.
4. We do but it’s from isolated populations in off-world colonies.I feel like 3 is the most interesting of these for humanity in this moment. 1 is kind of pointless, 2 is not really anything we can affect and 4 is a bit too far off.
Thoughts?
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:17 pm #4675
Lawrence Meyers
Participant@bruinbown There is a very worrisome few paragraphs in that article, Kyle.
Under subheading 3, regarding “Transhumanism”….
“Whereas the current human generational cycle takes some 20 years, a digitalized individual could replicate themselves in seconds or minutes, Bostrom said. Of course copying yourself isn’t without complications, Bostrom acknowledges.
“Which one of them is you?” he writes. “Who owns your property? Who is married to your spouse?”SHADOW PEOPLE, PEOPLE.
-
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:14 pm #4672
Maranda
Participant@bruinbown If Julie was describing a magazine cover, I’m not sure if one exists for that article specifically. The cover of the issue from which the article you posted comes doesn’t mention anything about humanity or its future, so I’m still looking for the image @julierei might have seen.
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:14 pm #4673
Anonymous
Inactive3 does seem like a good way to create shadows.
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:19 pm #4678
Kyle Bown
ParticipantStarted a new thread, which will make it really easy to delete if this is the wrong article.
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:33 pm #4682
Kyle Bown
ParticipantI don’t think that was it… I think I found the cover though:
And some info: http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/02/national-geographic-magazine-april-2017/
April 2017-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by
Kyle Bown.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:50 pm #4687
Hannah Schenck
ParticipantThis is interesting since this is next month’s edition and it is actually presently being released instead of being an old edition
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:51 pm #4689
Kyle Bown
Participant@shankfx22
If this is the right one, it came out two days ago. I’m reading the article now. Got the issue off the app. Even if it is wrong, happy to throw a few bucks Nat Geo’s way, and it’s an interesting article. -
March 30, 2017 at 5:55 pm #4693
Hannah Schenck
Participant@bruinbown It was just issued yes but it is April 2017 edition! I am definitely going to throw money towards this. Regardless, this is a fascinating read
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:56 pm #4696
Jackie
Participantdid the periscope get fixed? Any link>
-
March 30, 2017 at 5:57 pm #4697
Kyle Bown
Participant@shankfx22 Sorry. Didn’t mean to sound like I was disagreeing with you. Just trying to add information. You are, and were, 100% right. April 2017 issue.
-
March 30, 2017 at 6:00 pm #4700
Hannah Schenck
Participant@bruinbown hahaha oh man I didn’t take it that way ? We may as well put together a time where we all read it together hahaha Thanks for finding this though! I’m eager to read it!
-
March 30, 2017 at 6:48 pm #4718
Shaun
ParticipantPeriscope links:
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1gqxvqEZYawJB
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1kvKpnXdEAOJEQuestion: How would this have gone down if a member from the public NOT involved with the community was chosen? I’m sure it would have been a different path.
Also: If @julierei had chosen to sacrifice her own spot in the seminar it’s very possible she would have been immediately rejected. WWND What Would Noah Do!
-
March 30, 2017 at 7:23 pm #4729
Anonymous
InactiveGreat job @julierei!!! Awesome periscopes. Really interesting how she wanted you to forget everything from before…
Now if those people are excluded from Sunday’s meeting then I wonder who will be invited, or perhaps it will be super intimate and just be you!
-
March 30, 2017 at 7:51 pm #4747
Lia
ParticipantFrom Lust Facebook
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:02 pm #4750
Julie R Goldstein
Participant -
March 30, 2017 at 8:07 pm #4751
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:10 pm #4753
Julie R Goldstein
Participant@mike – It was small. A notepad. About the size of the invitation I was given.
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:12 pm #4754
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:13 pm #4755
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:13 pm #4757
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:21 pm #4759
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:24 pm #4760
-
March 30, 2017 at 8:25 pm #4761
Jeremy
ParticipantOh no, the Tiny Hamster YouTube channel is behind it all!
-
March 30, 2017 at 10:21 pm #4792
Anonymous
Inactive@mike it looks like a sigil.
-
March 31, 2017 at 10:33 am #4866
-
March 31, 2017 at 11:16 am #4888
Addison
Participant@lilmsfancpants @mike So we’d always associated the coffee stain with ~four, right? But if ~four really is gone, it’s weird for a coffee stain to very obviously appear in more possibly OSDM or OSDM-adjacent documents, unless either
A) our queen ~four is alive and well
B) the coffee stain was never from ~four
C) something is random
@julierei I’m assuming this is the sheet you wrote names on? Was the coffee stain there originally, or was that added after the fact?-
March 31, 2017 at 11:27 am #4894
Julie R Goldstein
Participant@addisonborn – Yes, it’s definitely the sheet I wrote on. It’s my handwriting, and a little tidbit: I couldn’t remember Cristen’s last name, so I wrote it as (wanda102) and it was still omitted. There was no coffee stain on it when I wrote everyone’s name down. That was added after the fact either digitally or by actual coffee.
-
-
March 31, 2017 at 11:17 am #4889
Anonymous
InactiveOthers have mentioned it, but I’m pretty sure that coffee stain is an Ouroboros.
-
March 31, 2017 at 11:38 am #4895
superstar
Participant@kipsie Or, perhaps, an “espressoboros”? 🙂
-
March 31, 2017 at 11:39 am #4896
Mike
Participant@addisonborn – Correct! I believe we first saw that on Four’s letters. I hate to admit it, but I’m pretty sure she’s dead. We heard her Jedi spirit talk to us at The One. @russell once mentioned that in his reply to Noah, he made it about the corporate environment. What if this is one big corporation…and in these types of corporations, people get trained and carry onward things within their training. What if Four was a trainer and made it a point to put coffee stains on things for some reason?
-
March 31, 2017 at 11:56 am #4900
Lia
ParticipantThat’s some seriously heartbreaking shit if that’s true! Like a little “miss you guys…” note from her. Ugh.
Nothing is random. Except @macbethinabathtub’s rotten apple from the van driver. That might be. But yeah, the coffee is absolutely a clue. It’s all about the details. I swear the music playing in Lock and Key was handpicked for my meeting. The songs changed at such CRAZY-perfect times.
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:05 pm #4903
Bryan Bishop
Participant@kipsie Definitely. And the community is the one eating itself..
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:13 pm #4907
Kimberly Stewart
Participant@mike I don’t personally attribute the coffee stain to ~Four. See these for examples:
April Newsletter signed by GK5 LINK
and
Heavily marked-up letter by ~Four LINK
If I had to guess who’s coffee rings, I’d say it’s someone other than the Gatekeepers… perhaps the OSDM overseeing all?
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:14 pm #4909
Addison
Participant@julierei since you brought up the stain being added digitally… you’re right. here’s proof (and sorry for my piss poor photoshop “skills” – it’s still early.)
@mike @lilmsfancpants – since it IS photoshopped, it could be the other way as well. something familiar to give us security. they’re possibly misrepresenting whoever they’re working with, and definitely taking advantage of our nostalgia.what the fuck have we gotten ourselves into.
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:18 pm #4911
Andrew Kasch
ParticipantI’d just like to think that every member of the OSDM is addicted to coffee. Running the world takes a lot of man-hours.
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:18 pm #4912
Anonymous
Inactive@bcbishop I thought the community was the phoenix, eventually rising from the ashes? We’ve got a real Fantastic Beasts situation on our hands, here…
-
March 31, 2017 at 12:18 pm #4913
Mike
ParticipantAhh good call @electrichippo Maybe the Clockmakers as well?
@addisonborn – you did that a little too well. SUS -
March 31, 2017 at 12:21 pm #4914
M.
Participant@addisonborn You just blew my mind with that? or wait… like @mike said a little to well maybe 😉 No, you really blew my mind.
-
March 31, 2017 at 1:36 pm #4923
Lawrence Meyers
ParticipantCoffee stain? People, that is obviously the septapods from ARRIVAL trying to tell us something.
-
March 31, 2017 at 1:36 pm #4924
Kimberly Stewart
Participant@bruinbown: I inquired with @julierei and she confirms you did indeed find the correct magazine: The Next Human, National Geographic, April 2017
The pertinent article is about how we, as a race, evolve, and what influences that evolution. A quote that sums it up in basic terms:
Does evolution now mean not just the slow grind of natural selection spreading desirable genes, but also everything that we can do to amplify our powers and the powers of the things we make — a union of genes, culture, and technology? And if so, where is it taking us?
Also, it’s interesting to note: ” **icons** which appear throughout this story, depict cultural and biological milestones in human evolution. ” Yes, many, many little symbols throughout.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by
Kimberly Stewart.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by
-
April 1, 2017 at 12:01 pm #5116
Julie R Goldstein
ParticipantQuick piece of information for those wondering when to pay attention to Periscope/Forum Posts/Etc for tomorrow’s event: We’ve been given the initial time frame of 4:00pm.
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.