-
Chelsea replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
Was there a noteable difference in A around that time? I feel like we always thought that Just Lurking was “Mason”. Mason seemingly having access to A as well could be a tick in the “Could Be Granik” column now that we see Granik being displeased with the way A was handing things. “Mason” seems like the kind of person to believe in doing thing…[Read more]
-
Megan replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
The 21st was the last phone call I received from Mason. That was also the day that A decided to harass me about an item in their possession and us having to have a meeting. I think Kortney also had a call from Mason that same day.
The 22nd was the day Mike posted his video.
The 23rd Brad got a call from Mike. Also that was the day that Bryan and…[Read more]
-
Chelsea replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
@bcbishop This looks like Granik thought A was doing an inadequate job. *If* Mason is Granik, and *if* Granik has taken back over A, that could be the reason. I still think that “Mason” at the computers after the exchange between A and JustLurking and then MyChild is “Mason” running all three on three different log ins. Him taking over after G…[Read more]
-
Megan replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
And for the record: 2267 is my iConfidant number. 7796 is @coryphella, I believe.
Yes.
Also I think we can probably say that they aren’t just iConfidant numbers at this point. This is how they refer to their assets. -
Bryan Bishop replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
@kevin. Yep. It also could infer that A created Slack as another data collection tool – this one focusing on the way in which we speak.
And for the record: 2267 is my iConfidant number. 7796 is @coryphella, I believe.
-
Kevin replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
The Tim stuff is interesting here, but this email is more revealing about A than just about anything else we’ve seen (still not very much, but gotta take what we can get).
A appears to run The Lust Experience email address.
A does not appear to be Sabrina, but we have seen different personalities for A on Slack, so doesn’t totally rule that…[Read more] -
Bryan Bishop replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
I hadn’t planned on sharing this, but in the interest of collecting information…
In October I reached out to The Experience / OSDM regarding an issue. Below is part of that email exchange, including information from Mr. Granik (received due to what I believe was an accidental cc from A).
The nature of my request and the response to it are n…[Read more]
-
sara changed their profile picture 7 years ago
-
sara replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
If Tim *is* Mason (or not!Mason) then the “stop asking about… you and the family” could be referring to Joyce and their kid.
-
Chelsea replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
@macbethinabathtub Oh yea!!! Thank you so much. I had completely forgotten about this.
Yea, maybe. That could be a possible age indicator. Interesting.
-
Lawrence Meyers replied to the topic Meeting of the Briarberg 7 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
We try not to talk about that.
-
Megan replied to the topic Meeting of the Briarberg 7 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
Also the “Briarberg 7” sounds like an IRA group that might have blown up some pubs in Britain about 30-40 years ago.
-
Megan replied to the topic Meeting of the Briarberg 7 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
LOL. A meeting at a bar. With a whiteboard.
Can this happen next weekend? Please? -
Lawrence Meyers started the topic Meeting of the Briarberg 7 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
(Wanted “Magnificent 7” but I don’t qualify, so….)
@kasch @chelsea @daela @thebuz @kasch @mike @larry
Chelsea and I think it might be productive if those of us at the Briarberg meet got together and hashed through all we know about Briarberg. We intend to very definitely probably maybe get to the bottom of this.
Would everyone share their…[Read more]
-
Russell replied to the topic Just Lurking in Slack – 11/3 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
@daela, I think your point may be the opening door we are looking for.
They will have us do things that we previously believed didn’t represent who we are.
Aren’t some leopards in this jungle constantly changing their spots already?
Your sentence made me reflect back to one of the earliest traces of your interpretation of the “paradox” – the F…[Read more]
-
Sage replied to the topic Just Lurking in Slack – 11/3 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
Wow Remy really HATES Tina.
-
Lawrence Meyers replied to the topic Just Lurking in Slack – 11/3 in the forum SIGHTINGS 7 years ago
Going to echo Larry here (just shorter)
“Shorter”. That’s usually a pretty good idea. And also easy to do.
-
Violet replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
Oh, most definitely. RIP Tina. I hope her cats are taken care of.
-
Chris replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
It’s not concrete, but when Otis reactivated for a moment on September 19th, that longwinded and fairly graphic status was also addressed to a Tim.
…and then the next day you got a baby faced puckered ass kid in a suit telling you that you must have had a bad dream again and you need another spa treatment. Pay me and I’ll keep on keepin…
-
Megan replied to the topic Who is Timothy Granik? in the forum CONJECTURE 7 years ago
Yes.
- Load More