Sean

I’m loathe to admit it, but we haven’t heard anything since the cryptic Facebook post. I surely isn’t some kind of big in-person thing. Maybe it’s a broadcast or a 1:1 event or something, but with the iConfidant thing happening on the 11th it’s not outside the realm of possibility that the 6/3 date is simply being pushed to the 11th.

Hey kids,

Love the enthusiasm. But this one beat you by a couple minutes. Go there to converse about meeting your demise iConfidant, please

Split this topic off from the bigger thread per @meghanmayhem‘s request

In Tension, we had a character kind of like this “Encroaching Dusk” person who spoke cryptically and sent unusual messages. He went by the name “Light2Dark”. We never found his purpose, but could the two be linked?

Both seem to have a knowledge of what’s going on at the higher order of things, both are very cryptic, both reference light…[Read more]

Absolutely possible, but I DEFINITELY wouldn’t get your hopes up for anything. Literally the only thing that we know at this moment is the date. It could be a phone thing, could be an in person thing, could be a Periscope broadcast, could even just be nothing but a red herring.

A few days ago the Lust Facebook page posted this Saturday’s date. Traditionally that means that something is going to happen on that date. Last time this pattern showed up it was a lead up to the registration event. We don’t know what this one is but the pattern suggests it will be something not insignificant

@parzival – I’m afraid there isn’t really a “timeline” per se. Those that have been speaking with iConfidants generally hear a response of about once per week but that number varies wildly per person.

Further, with some sort of event happening on this Saturday we normally see a dip in activity until after the event.

I’m afraid all that I can…[Read more]

Excellent points and questions @russell, and indeed the reason for the topic in the first place.

First, no I absolutely don’t want to limit anyone to post only positive things. That’s pure censorship and not what the goal is. What is the goal, however, is to cut down on the negative posts that are nearly solely for the purpose of being negative.…[Read more]

That’s going to be a case by case basis. By and large, almost all in game arguing is not only okay but condoned and encouraged. With the exception of things that cross obvious lines and attack people viciously and horribly, fights over in game stuff is a-okay and I’ll probably be doing a lot of it myself.

We cannot and should not ever moderate…[Read more]

@mike you get extra points for the added compliments at the beginning and end.

You’re not wrong about forcing conversation elsewhere. It’s been a huge problem and one of the main reasons why we’ve tried to moderate more hands off all throughout Tension and the beginning portions of Lust. However, there have been repeated complaints over the past…[Read more]

@addisonborn – wouldn’t be out of the question. Especially since, as far as we’ve seen, the major rituals that these people are performing have been either this or the one during Ascension, both linked directly with their search for an Oracle.

A terrifying thought to think that Tension may have been focused on the search of an Oracle but Lust is…[Read more]

@izryn – Yeah… Unfortunately we can’t delete activity feed data. Only topics and replies

Andy is in some serious danger. As a service to our community, I cannot allow posts that would put others in that same danger. For now I’m making a judgement call to delete the post that had a geolocation

Wow @addisonborn, victim blame much?

Gonna tell me that the way he was dressed he was really asking for it? It, in this case, being ritualistic murder?

RIP Andy
RIP Otis
RIP my own sense of what’s real and what’s not

Anyone got a link to the Periscope for archival purposes?

Could be the maddyxxx thing. But when speaking about data breaches and system stability it could just be a classic, old fashioned Trojan Horse style virus.

If they’re talking about the maddyxxx thing, that suggests that their data was compromised because someone pulled some info from it. That means that the breach is essentially secured at this…[Read more]