superstar

@mistere, I meant more generally/OOG, dealing with all the distractions that come with being “never silent” online and in the various ways we promote/market/publicly share ourselves with others in real life. I recall that interviewer Ramin (??) made comments about this subject during a few of the in-person registrations.

When it comes to IG info,…[Read more]

@mistere, I meant more generally/OOG, dealing with all the distractions that come with being “never silent” online and in the various ways we promote/market/publicly share ourselves with others in real life Interviewer Ramin (??) made comments about this subject during a few of the in-person registrations.

When it comes to IG info, I’m all about…[Read more]

PERFECTION, @prufrock5150!!!

An alternate interpretation of “Never Silent” occurred to me. What if we read it as more of a commentary rather than a directive or battle cry? A lament on our need to share so much with strangers, “to be seen” as @daela said), and all of the noise the pursuit of this desire creates.

The latest from my iConfidant:

iConfidant:
“How are you feeling? Do you see the wind?”

Me:
“I’m feeling relaxed today. I just want to lounge in a hammock in the shade, daydreaming while I snack on a big bowl of watermelon. I wouldn’t say that I see the wind. I *feel* the wind… on my skin… in my hair. Do you see the wind? Do you smell the…[Read more]

I’m going to try to head out around 3pm tomorrow, work permitting.

I also got an email from my iConfidant match with the ‘first name, last initial: #’ subject line (my number is 6006). All it said was ‘hello :)’. I responded with extremely-cautious-but-friendly brevity.

@warrior I never got a call, just the email.

@confuseddude, Same here. Reluctantly dipping my toes into the cold, murky water.

Also got accepted!

@nking, I wondered the same thing. IMO, animals are beings, not things. Still, I think it’s pretty open. Whatever will set you up for the most heartbreak, I suppose 😉

@lenize I got a “maybe” from the Sinclairs, and only sent my email to iConfidant yesterday. So, who knows?

@nothenrygale yes. @kortneydarling, I believe.

@kevin I think maybe Noah was the one that was promised something larger. But, maybe once he got it, he realized it was a Faustian bargain. And, too bad for him and perhaps not of her own doing, Sarah’s programmed to succeed, and will destroy anything that gets in her way, even if that thing is her own husband.

@nothenrygale
“Anticipation…An-ti-ci-pa-aaaa-tion”
-Carly Simon

random speculation, post periscope…

Sarah Sinclair is a robot/android/AI/hybrid-human. More specifically, the “missing piece” to Noah Sinclair, provided by IConfidant (at his request?). Unfortunately, something has gone horribly wrong with this particular love connection. Maybe Sarah’s part of the .03% (IConfidant boasts a 99.7% success rate).…[Read more]

@tyson I just had a thought about the quote, “Sometimes we think we see someone, but it’s not the person we think it is. They just look exactly alike”. What if we interpret it not to be about an actual doppleganger of someone, but rather how we “see/know” a single individual (“Sometimes we think we know someone…”, etc.). Talking about the diffi…[Read more]

Oh, dang! 🙂 @sbkevin