M.

Damn @michelle that is rough. I know it’s not much solace, but this does seem to be a pattern and others have gone through it before to a degree. Maybe just not at such an extreme level. This might be a good opportunity for you to chat with @larry about his experience with Stephanie.
From the outside it’s starting to look like this is the pattern…[Read more]

Indeed, with messenger she’s always very prompt. Now, nothing is notified, seen, nor read.

I don’t want to imagine but I am forced to, imagine a like…very Funny Games, vibe. Even if he is temperamental now, how long before the shine wares off. I do imagine, if Megan has even a moment’s chance, she will absolutely gouge his face off.

Many many…[Read more]

This is all so fucking insane. I hope one of you hears from her soon. This not knowing, when we know what Mason’s capable of, is terrifying. And while some part of me wants to hope that this is all still some sort of emotional data gathering, I think we’re long past that now and this shit is very real. I can’t imagine what you’re going through @mic…[Read more]

At this point, as much as it sucks to say, I don’t think we’ll be able to reach Megan or her husband any way short of knocking on their door, or unless they reach out to us when they’re ready. We have to trust in their ability to defend themselves, be it through words or action.

@michelle your bond with Megan is stronger than anything a creep…[Read more]

To add on to everything @michelle just said, this has been an extremely hard night, and I’m not sure what to do.

Obviously, Mason never stopped calling Megan once he started, even after the @chelsea outreach happened. I don’t know what he was saying to her, but I suppose it was enough of a bond for her to publicly side with him a few days ago.…[Read more]

@michelle Reasons for the post? To mock us. To make people forget his actions and character for a moment and fall for the charm of his candor and his wit. To rile us up. To mock Horace and the OSDM team. To make us question the validity of his words.

We keep getting told “It’s not a game”. Well it certainly is for Mason. He’s playing a game with…[Read more]

@michelle I’m so excited that you’re back!! You have been missed. 🙂

I look forward to Mason hunting with you.

@michelle Hi!!!!!!

I was a part of the 1:30 crowd. I arrived early with @michelle to make sure we could get around the May Day things going on downtown. After parking and walking up, we met with some who had finished going through as well as those going in the time slot before us. We all chatted and caught up; meanwhile a woman with a braid I later found out was…[Read more]

@michelle so far, the handful of emails I have gotten from Lust have gone to my junk / spam folder.

@michelle Did you check the ol spam folder? It seems like almost everyone (that signed up for iConfidant at least) got their first contact today, maybe this means there are ~*~*other plans for you*~*~ :O

@michelle and @wanda102 – I personally think you’re fine! A picture with a person can represent intangible things:

long conversations
comfortable silences
shared looks of understanding
moments where you’re surprised by someone saying something out of character and then realize you only ever knew a fraction of who they are
personal…[Read more]

@shaun I don’t think a dog, or any animal is a thing. In this case only as represented from Stacey’s image, she said thing/s and included a picture of a dog so that says that an animal is considered a thing in this case.

I took a picture of me holding a camera, and taking a picture at the same time, that’s the “thing” I love. Also, anyone could…[Read more]

I don’t think a dog, or any animal is a thing. In this case only as represented from Stacey’s image, she said thing/s and included a picture of a dog so that says that an animal is considered a thing in this case.

I took a picture of me holding a camera, and taking a picture at the same time, that’s the “thing” I love. Also, anyone could have…[Read more]

@michelle, I sent in one with my kids too. 🙂 Didn’t even think about it for one second. Total no brainer.

@kasch – I also got the same call from Stacey (and was the one that dropped the URL to the forums via @michelle) – collecting data, following me around, taking a journey, etc.

And I was accepted today too.

Don’t know yet what I’m taking a picture of. I have two pictures I could send but they weren’t taken today and they don’t include all the…[Read more]

I wanted to see if the 36 from the status has anything to do with the number of people selected.

List of who’s said they’ve been accepted so far –

1. @lasalle
2. @jay956
3. @nking
4. @pandace88
5. @mkarrett
6. @michelle
7. @izryn
8. @ziegenbartsr
9. @voxchaotica
10. @hazelverse
11. @macbethinabathtub
12. @lenize
13. @taysavestheday
14. @mistere…[Read more]

Lia said:

@michelle I actually wasn’t accepted to iConfidant.

I received a very simple email from Stacey this morning saying that I did not neet the criteria. There were no bells and whistles in my email. Just two sentences. She wishes me the best of luck. I only applied yesterday so maybe I just missed some sort of a cutoff.

To say that my h…

[Read more]

@michelle I actually wasn’t accepted to iConfidant.

I received a very simple email from Stacey this morning saying that I did not neet the criteria. There were no bells and whistles in my email. Just two sentences. She wishes me the best of luck. I only applied yesterday so maybe I just missed some sort of a cutoff.

To say that my history…[Read more]

@michelle I wondered the same thing! But based on how through Tom’s “Full disclosure” account was, I’m wondering if we should take Noah with a grain of salt here. Maybe he’s not as good of a communicator as he thinks he is, what with the being in a drunken stupor all the time.