Kimberly Stewart

One more thought: @taysavestheday, I believe the thing you did that set this in motion was appealing to Sarah in regards to how you relate to her. You told her how you also would do whatever it took to survive, achieve and succeed. You backed this up with stories of your life and career. Watching your correspondence with your confidant merely…[Read more]

“If you want to be brought up from the bottom, you listen to the man at the top.” -Horace

@taysavestheday, you’re a very smart guy, a very driven guy, but it does appear you’ve just participated in a one-sided negotiation. You may have even just sold your soul to the proverbial devil.

It seems your task now is to prove yourself useful to…[Read more]

This has crossed my mind plenty, @chrysalis359. Sometimes I read the confidant transcripts posted to forum and feel guilty because I worry I’m eavesdropping on something not intended for my eyes. Although, I have noticed that most of the quoted transcript material is more of a small talk or joking around nature, so I suppose that seems fairly…[Read more]

@rizzzoooooo & @thebuz I’m also getting a lot of lengthy correspondence with my confidant. I believe we are up to around 40 messages now. The time of day they arrive seems to vary, as does the content. Mine is a female in the Los Angeles area. I call her Sumi which is short for Sumitra which means “good friend” in Hindi/Sanskrit. She works as a…[Read more]

Stacey wrote to me a few minutes ago, very much in line with this recent FB post. She admits no ill doings or ill intent. She’s been very consistent with me. An excerpt:

“…please don’t listen to what people that don’t even know me tell you about me. I’m doing my best to keep this company afloat and make it grow even further. I am very proud…[Read more]

@blondie Let me potentially complicate things a little more with a reminder that Stacey isn’t at all new to or inexperienced with the world of investors and investments. Prior to iConfidant she was a managing consultant at an investment firm that specialized in start-ups.

Are you even sure this was someone from Lust? If it was I’d think there will be some sort of follow up.

I’d had this same thought @macbethinabathtub. @mistere‘s confidant very well could be the one on Stacey’s radar as having gone rogue. It doesn’t seem Brian has had any reason to be suspicious of his confidant though so I’d prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt, unless very convincing evidence proves otherwise. VERY convincing evidence.…[Read more]

@confuseddude That’s really peculiar. Have you considered asking your confidant where they learned these things about you? Maybe their answer will turn out to be completely innocuous. I had a similar thing when I asked mine if she was the one who first contacted me with very stilted robe-speak. She explained the odd choice of language in a way…[Read more]

Best of luck @mistere. Seems you’re still quite open minded about iConfidant and Stacey, as am I. I’ll be really interested to hear about your meeting.

I’ve interacted with both Otis and Stick Man. My interaction with Stick Man was more impactful and felt more genuine. While I don’t want to see a nice old guy get hurt, I’ll admit at this point, a bad guy who admits he’s bad is looking pretty good.

@daela & @bcbishop – Did you both opt to send Stacey the entire email chains, as requested? I’m not sure I could do that to my confidant. I don’t understand why Stacey thinks this would be helpful in her investigation.

I have to believe Stacey is in way over her head. I’ve repeatedly expressed my evidence backed concerns for the safety and security of her and her company and she’s resorted to either ignoring me or telling me “Everything’s just fine!”

Stacey, I’ve grown to love you like a sister but putting your head in the sand and/or lying to us isn’t going…[Read more]

@rizzzoooooo there’s a bit of questionnaire stuff shown in The Book that Sarah might not have given you.

The one you’re specifically asking about is:

___Unhappy childhood
___Emotional/behavioral problems ___Medical problems
___Sexual abuse

Some of the other word choices for the one we were discussing above…[Read more]

On Page 29 of “Chronicles of The OOA” some of the words on the questionnaire are shown as blocked out by “OSDM DELETE PER INVESTIGATION 14B.87.” The blocked out words are:

6.Have you ever believed you were being followed?
7.Have you felt the possibility of a genuine haunting?

…And, whatever written in answer the respondent might have added.

Thank you, this is really great. I’m exhausted just reading through these again. It brings me right back to these unsure times when we had no idea what this was and took a leap of faith in giving strangers all this information.

One question that I recall that they didn’t provide for you @rizzzoooooo listed a bunch of words and asked you to…[Read more]

I’m glad it’s proving helpful.

A few updates/additions: All blanks have been filled in, links to the original Facebook posts added, and some re-formatting.

So many insightful things have been said on this topic so far. I particularly enjoyed @lilmsfancpants & @macbethinabathtub‘s takes. To pile on…

This blog won’t scare Noah Sinclair. Noah would proudly tell us all these things himself because, as he’s demonstrated so far, he’s a little bit of crazy and a lot of no fucks given. In Chapter One I…[Read more]