Tagged: them
This topic has 46 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Addison.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:34 pm #103
Addison
ParticipantMaybe @lustadder ?
Who else may not be “one of us?”
And who’s going to be the first of them to break the silence?
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:35 pm #104
Megan
ParticipantI was just wondering the same thing. also maybe @wiretrees?
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Megan.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:36 pm #106
Julie R Goldstein
Participant@wiretrees looks suspect too…
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Julie R Goldstein.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:37 pm #109
Anonymous
InactiveAll four were created before the site went live, they’re all suspect.
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:43 pm #112
Mike
ParticipantNo Michelle yet? Where is she hiding?
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:45 pm #113
Megan
ParticipantMaybe Michelle is @thecontroller?
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:46 pm #114
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantIf Michelle would be any of them, she would most certainly be @thecontroller.
That powerhungry bitch. -
February 13, 2017 at 5:48 pm #115
Andrew Kasch
ParticipantWe don’t know if the OSDM is behind this yet. A lot can happen in a couple of months…
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:50 pm #120
Anonymous
InactiveWell, they are proudly presenting it…
-
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:50 pm #119
Carl Webb
ParticipantI of course am not suspect.
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:51 pm #121
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:54 pm #123
Andrew Kasch
ParticipantMichelle pissed off a lot of people…some very powerful. I wonder if we can count her among the living.
-
February 13, 2017 at 5:54 pm #124
Taylor Winters
ParticipantInterestingly, those users have nice pictures behind their names while we do not. I find that interesting and definitely differentiates them.
-
February 13, 2017 at 6:29 pm #139
JakeO
ParticipantThese profile pictures are rather…suspect
-
February 13, 2017 at 6:30 pm #140
Mustafa Said
ParticipantFirst, I think my pic is pretty nice lol.
Second, we already know that ODSM is behind whatever this is going to be. I wonder how long it’ll take for Michelle to come out of hiding.
I’d guess that whoever is the first to break their silence, it’ll happen tomorrow.
-
February 13, 2017 at 7:20 pm #156
-
February 13, 2017 at 7:24 pm #158
Tim Redman
Participant…
-
February 13, 2017 at 7:44 pm #159
Sean
ModeratorOut of all of them, @wiretrees seems to have the first activity, at roughly 2p PST, with the rest firing up around 5p PST. Perhaps worth noting? The names suggest that @TheController will be leading us but @wiretrees may be playing a rather large roll, as well.
No idea on the other two, though. @lustadder could possibly either refer to someone who is going to be enhancing the experience by, in some way, adding lust? Or perhaps “adder” is a snake reference, as in the snake that offered Eve the apple? And @thevoyeur is just… what, a watcher? Just here for the show?
God DAMN I’ve missed blind speculation
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Sean. Reason: Added Eve speculation
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
February 13, 2017 at 7:58 pm #161
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantI totally get behind lustadder being a reference to the temptation of the snake.
-
February 13, 2017 at 8:40 pm #169
Maranda
ParticipantWe don’t know if Michelle is any of the four though. It could be her bosses, or perhaps her underlings.
-
February 14, 2017 at 8:27 am #192
Blondie
Participant@michelle I think your photo is nice too <3 Maybe @taysavestheday is just speaking for himself 😛
-
February 14, 2017 at 8:39 am #194
-
February 14, 2017 at 8:45 am #195
Taylor Winters
Participant-
February 14, 2017 at 8:50 am #196
Blondie
Participant@taysavestheday Dreams can come true… *adds “Give Taylor a makeover and profile pic photoshoot” to the “To Do Next Time I Visit LA” list*
-
-
February 14, 2017 at 10:02 am #212
Masomoment
ParticipantSo very interesting… *goes to compare everyones profile*
-
February 14, 2017 at 11:52 am #247
GoldTongue
ParticipantSo happy to be back.
-
February 14, 2017 at 1:21 pm #254
Kimberly Stewart
Participant@lustadder seems to be taking the role that Addison Barrow had in the earliest days of Tension… that of innocuous website admin who published new items.
-
February 14, 2017 at 1:49 pm #259
Kimberly Stewart
ParticipantSeems to be some issues uploading images right now, so I’ll do it the low-tech way. To demonstrate what I mean regarding @lustadder’s role so far, look here:
-
-
February 14, 2017 at 1:51 pm #260
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantLustAdder and WireTrees don’t seem to have been active since the creation of the forum, however TheController and TheVoyeur have both logged in recently (though they haven’t posted or favorited anything in that time period).
-
February 14, 2017 at 2:08 pm #262
Jackie
ParticipantI’m betting on The Controller will make first contact. With a name like that, how could they not?
-
February 14, 2017 at 3:31 pm #280
Meghan Mayhem
ParticipantTheController already made first contact yesterday, but deleted the comment quickly afterwards.
-
-
February 14, 2017 at 3:32 pm #281
Sean
Moderator@meghanmayhem – I missed that. What did they say?
-
February 14, 2017 at 3:35 pm #282
Meghan Mayhem
Participant@kipsie posted that the site seemed to just be a WordPress page, and that she hadn’t found anything interesting yet. TheController responded with something like “Are you sure? Keep looking”. That’s when Kipsie found the source code note addressed to her with the “Maybe this is interesting? FEB15 7PM” line. By the time it was found, TheController’s post was gone.
-
February 14, 2017 at 4:13 pm #294
Josiah Salazar
ParticipantWhere do we think the FEB15 7PM is leading us? On here? Or something like facebook or twitter? that means I should get a twitter huh?
-
February 14, 2017 at 4:26 pm #299
Sage
ParticipantWire Tree seems to be the makers of the Tension website. “Website experience by Wire Tree”.
-
February 14, 2017 at 4:29 pm #300
Sean
Moderator@sfire8 – Damn, nice find. So we’re looking at…
WireTree – Site creator, admin
LustAdder – Content creatorTheController, TheVoyeur are going to be involved with the community, maybe?
-
February 14, 2017 at 4:37 pm #302
-
-
February 14, 2017 at 5:04 pm #308
Christine Barger
ParticipantDoesn’t is say participant under our names? Does it theirs?
-
February 14, 2017 at 6:30 pm #319
Michel Rheault
Participantedit: forget it, just realised i was late in the conversation.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Michel Rheault.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Michel Rheault.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
February 14, 2017 at 6:45 pm #323
Michel Rheault
ParticipantTruly constructive participation: Put a alarm for tomorrow Feb 15 7pm in my icloud calendar.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Michel Rheault.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
February 14, 2017 at 7:27 pm #325
Julie R Goldstein
ParticipantThere is only one controller and their name is Anoch. I smell a false prophet.
-
February 15, 2017 at 3:10 am #340
Michel Rheault
ParticipantUntil now you all assumed it is a direct sequel, whiles i think it would be a different world.
-
February 15, 2017 at 4:37 am #342
Addison
ParticipantI’m still catching up on this and running on like 2 hours of sleep, so apologies if this goes off the rails, but I just realized we have a handy dandy timeline of account creation now, right? On the profile pages, clicking the arrow to the left or right seemingly shows which account was created before or after the one you’re looking at, respectively..
So clicking all the way to the left, these special people were registered in this order:
@lustadder
@wiretrees
@thecontroller
@thevoyeurthen @kipsie was the first regular participant in the forums, followed by @coryphella, @bcbishop, and so on.
Really cool that @kipsie was first in and also got the callout in the site source!
But maybe this is a pecking order? There are no gatekeepers or anything of that nature just yet, but what if we have another light2dark, or Aleister, or anyone of that nature already here?
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.