Cristen

@wanda102 @thegilded The answer to that is most likely the latter, but in that instance the decision you make would be based off of a general background and/or understanding of who your investors are already, no?

@wanda102 – A fair point but we aren’t selling them anything. We don’t know what they want or who they even are. They want something from us, something worth putting effort into. They’re the ones with something to lose in this bargain. It’s only fair that if they’re profiting off us we at least know something about them

@111error Yes he seemed more pleased in the idea of the “Mysterious We”
I do wonder if this is that same man that called all 3 of us, the same man that took @rizzzoooooo and @wanda102 out for sweet delights, and the same man that showed up at your doorstep.

I didn’t necessarily take this call as something in the interest of gaining trust so much…[Read more]

@wanda102 Oh yeah?

@russell

All this data, the whole premise iConfidant put forth is all based on emotional connection it seems. If you are correct and they were data-mining in various ways to get “emotional readings” of some kind for us all, then the big question is “Why?”

I love this question. There is an article that just loosely breaks down some reasons…[Read more]

lol at Fluffer guy.
Yea the dude was incredibly relaxed on the phone with us. Like suuuupppper chill bro type voice. I mean, he ended the last call with giving us the locations and saying “cool, see ya soon”, which almost never happens with lust type people… usually it just ends with a *click.

As @wanda102 said, he was pretty polite with us…[Read more]

@larry Exactly the point I was trying to make back in Chapter 1 regarding the Sinclair’s warnings of iConfidant. Not quite an ad hominem attack though, that would be more a case of the “Genetic Fallacy”. If he was indeed a madman, as your example puts forward, it wouldn’t be an attack on his character if he was indeed mad. It would just be another…[Read more]

Something that I just remembered! @wanda102 touched on it briefly, but it was just before he went into the story about being fat. He was really stressing a point that you can get a lot of what you want just by being attractive. People come to him just because of the way he looks. This might be nothing but figured it might just be something?…[Read more]

I think you’re both right @wanda102 and @thebuz about Lust being interwoven into all of this. I see the breakdown like this:

Power = Greed
(The Investors, Tom, Horace, Sarah, etc., all wanting power to assert their individual will)

Sex = Lust
(Maybe. I don’t think Lust Exp gas been that sexy to date, but it’s still early)

Control = Wrath
(I…[Read more]

I think you’re both right @wanda102 and @thebuz about Lust being interwoven into all of this. I see the breakdown like this:

Power = Greed
(The Investors, Tom, Horace, Sarah, etc., all wanting power to assert their individual will)

Sex = Lust
(Maybe. I don’t think Lust Exp gas been that sexy to date, but it’s still early)

Control = Wrath
(I…[Read more]

I’m not familiar with The Kreutzer Sonata, but according to Wikipedia it is: “an argument for the ideal of sexual abstinence and an in-depth first-person description of jealous rage.”

Along with the encounter that @wanda102 and @rizzzoooooo had yesterday, there’s a major line of denying your impulses, a major turn from where we were with The…[Read more]

Let the madness reign! Now, will we see more ‘success’ stories? If so, what happened to the failures? Marvelous weirdness @wanda102 and @rizzzoooooo

Does feel like The System, but I feel as though a student of The System would have left @rizzzoooooo and @wanda102 with the bill.

Your crop searches may be in the past, but I have no doubt we’ll still be very in need of your art history knowledge in the future @wanda102.

And I agree…Chapter 2 is not likely to simply hint at things anymore. We’re gonna get smacked square in the face.

@wanda102 Yes I definitely agree. They have one goal with different paths

@wanda102 Thank you for constantly doing this, what was it like to be sitting in that room and to see Sabrina was all of our iconfidants, that blew my mind. I speculated she could be someone’s iconfidant, but never imagined she’d be all of them.

@sfire8 What I feel Sabrina/ Addison/ whoever she is calling her self, got inside all of our heads.…[Read more]

@wanda102 “Though in context it also implies that some of the Book Party attendees were the Investors…”

Dun, dun, DUNNNNNNNN!!!! 🙂

OH! @shankfx22

This is a perfect example of being too distracted with yourself, your image, or anything that is vain when you apply too much focus to it, that it blinds you from what is happening around you. 

Maybe like how we’re all too self absorbed with our iConfidants to heed the OBVIOUS warnings that they are not to be trusted and it’s…[Read more]