This topic has 37 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 4 months ago by Julie R Goldstein.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:10 am #21566TheControllerKeymaster
This morning, there was a hiccup within the narrative. We have a lot of storylines that are on timed releases. Accidentally, one of our characters Hostess In Black moved ahead earlier than intended. (next chapter).
Once this happened it launched a series of events we quickly tried to rectify by deleting posts and hiding this narrative thread.
You are all so conspiracy minded that you jumped onto this rapidly, and it snowballed out of control.
Please note for the next 24 hours we will be doing updated maintenance and may be removing a few posts here and there to maintain the integrity of our narrative.
Thank you for your understanding.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:12 am #21568KevinParticipant
Do you have any information on the Hostess In Black Twitter account which seems to contradict what you’re saying here?
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:13 am #21569Bryan BishopParticipant
You’re sounding an awful lot like Dr. Ford in this post, @thecontroller. Did a fly unexpectedly land on Hostess in Black?
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:14 am #21570Brad RuweParticipant
If this is the case, why is the Twitter account still rolling? If this was just a simple character in your narrative, why is she still going off in a place you can’t “control” the narrative? Something doesn’t match up here.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:15 am #21571AnonymousInactive
What @kevin said…@thecontroller the Hostess in Black started calling us out for deleting things, but that was your effort to control an accidental release of a character? Seems a bit problematic…
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:16 am #21572AddisonParticipant
So hold up. This is getting brushed off by insinuating that HiB is IT, and just had a glitch?
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:16 am #21573AnonymousInactive
Also blaming us for it snowballing is an excellent way of saying that you fucked up. Deflection tends to signify that.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:16 am #21574AnonymousInactive
@addisonborn Indeed…
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:18 am #21575Kyle BownParticipant
Your “storyline” doesn’t seem to agree @thecontroller. Good luck though.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:18 am #21576AnonymousInactive
Oh, neat. “Everything is fine” and it’s our fault.
Cool gaslighting, brosdm.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:18 am #21577Lukas LParticipant
@thecontroller thank you. I enjoy the shadows from the firelight far more than what ever we see when we exit this cave.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:19 am #21578SeanModerator
What maintenance would be required…? Any time that a
disgruntled real person with actual insider informationmistimed scheduled release has come up before, much less severe methods were taken to silence them. -
August 7, 2017 at 10:19 am #21579Hannah SchenckParticipant
So why bring in Stephanie then? If it was a narrative hiccup, why call another actress to bury the Hostess in Black? This does not add up…
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:20 am #21580AnonymousInactive
Is no one else impressed that they have a series of Indiana Jones type booby traps that can be tripped and set off a chain of events and interactions? That’s some damn cool sophisticated storytelling devices.
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:20 am #21581AnonymousInactive
@thecontroller Now I am curious to see how this censorship goes moving forward. 🙂
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:21 am #21582AnonymousInactive
@thebuz I’ll be impressed when I have had coffee and stop wondering why they didn’t have safety nets to go alongside said booby traps…
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:31 am #21585Andrew KaschParticipant
“You are all so conspiracy minded…”
Whatever could’ve put that in our heads?
-
August 7, 2017 at 10:50 am #21587CassandraParticipant
Gaslighting!
This is not a narrative hiccup. That is some BS.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:05 am #21592Michael RizzoParticipant
I wouldn’t so much say this is IT @addisonborn. I just woke up so forgive me if I’m totally wrecking this but IT=MyChild, correct? Inwhich case I wouldn’t see why IT would be the software they use for storyline reveals. That plus I’m fairly certain this ain’t just come software going haywire
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:11 am #21595AddisonParticipant
@rizzzoooooo I thought IT was the AI developed alongside iConfidant, and what they were replacing the creators with? And MyChild was a different beast.. I may be completely misremembering, don’t have notes in front of me at the moment.
-
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:07 am #21594Lawrence MeyersParticipant
I think my crisis management fees just went up.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:14 am #21596Brad RuweParticipant
My take was that IT was the original AI. Developed by Stacey, modified by The Investors to replace DLB and CS. MyChild if I understand it correctly was the next stage of development Stacey made on it to get revenge on The Investors.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:30 am #21597Julie R GoldsteinParticipant
There is no narrative. There is only Anoch.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:30 am #21598Twan IntarathuchParticipant
@thecontroller
If there’s nothing to hide, no danger to the audience, then there’s no reason to delete anything. -
August 7, 2017 at 11:31 am #21599Bryan BishopParticipant
I don’t have all the source links handy, but I believe the reveal was that IT was the original AI from Stacey, as @nothenrygale points out. The shadow accounts on the forums were test runs to see if it could impersonate community members. The next step was going to be for IT to replace Noah Sinclair, which is what prompted his freakout.
After everybody’s motives became clear, however, Stacey turned it into MyChild, and embedded it into the forums (and, it’s been inferred, other OSDM systems).
My gut is that IT/MyChild isn’t behind the HiB because it’s not openly adopting the personality of somebody that we know. Instead, HiB is a secret account. MyChild accounts wouldn’t need to be kept secret, because impersonation is one of its strengths.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:46 am #21600Michael RizzoParticipant
Yes yes, looking back now you guys are right. MyChild was the next stage of that program after being tweaked by Stacey. And I have to agree with @bcbishop, guy is telling me this is no software… this is a someone and not a something.
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:48 am #21601SeanModerator
Update from Hostess in Black:
https://twitter.com/Hostessinblack/status/894631118179147777
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:49 am #21602
-
August 7, 2017 at 11:57 am #21604Bryan BishopParticipant
So… a certain small dog lover is now following the Hostess in Black Twitter account. Link right here.
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:00 pm #21605AnonymousInactive
Update from HostessInBlack:
https://twitter.com/Hostessinblack/status/894634295037263872 -
August 7, 2017 at 12:03 pm #21607Andrew KaschParticipant
Who could this person be? I’m willing to bet it’s not @111error as that would be too obvious.
Hmmm…
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:04 pm #21609ChloeParticipant
All I know is that it will most likely blow our minds once Hostess reveals.
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:06 pm #21611Bryan BishopParticipant
After noticing SDL was following the Hostess account, I asked him what was up. His response:
if you know who it is PM me. We both know I was in town for a reason last week, there is too much riding on this for this BS right now.
— Clint Sears (@clintisawesome) August 7, 2017
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:08 pm #21616Julie R GoldsteinParticipant
Clint has been compromised. Disengage!
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:16 pm #21631AnonymousInactive
Oh hello.
I have not & would not tell anyone to not participate. Things are fucky enough right now without letting people think that too. Please stop.
— Clint Sears (@clintisawesome) August 7, 2017
-
August 7, 2017 at 12:19 pm #21632Bryan BishopParticipant
I’ve got zero analysis or take on what’s happening right now. Just more of the Twitter convo update.
None of this makes sense.
I've got the screenshots. This is FUCKED. If you have something to tell people, say it publicly.
— Bryan Bishop (@bcbishop) August 7, 2017
-
August 7, 2017 at 1:33 pm #21653Michael RizzoParticipant
“48 hour retreat”?? Sususususus
-
August 7, 2017 at 6:08 pm #21819Julie R GoldsteinParticipant
Sorry @thecontroller, this isn’t something you can just walk away from. HiB may have given us a cover story before disappearing, but if she wasn’t actually revealing your little secrets, you wouldn’t have used Clint or Stephanie as pawns in your little games and you most certainly wouldn’t have taken your oh-so-valuable time to come here and force feed us horse shit.
You want to try and frame me? Well then consider yourself officially On Notice!
GLORY BE!
- This reply was modified 7 years, 4 months ago by Julie R Goldstein.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 4 months ago by Julie R Goldstein.
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.