Cristen

Apologies for the delay in writing this. Hopefully the Periscope sufficed in the short term.

My interaction with Joyce was nearly identical to the ones had by @wanda102 and @kevin (awesome recaps!!!). I will add that along with her long-hugging, @joycecarlberg gives the most amazing eye-roll I’ve ever seen. (This came when I mentioned recent…[Read more]

I’ve had a long day and need to pass out but my initial thoughts are that @joycecarlberg some how managed to deliver and not deliver at the same time.
But I am impressed she offered this chance to @kevin, @wanda102, and @bcbishop. Perhaps my impression of her was incorrect and she isn’t the postering blithering GK3 knock off she came off as ini…

[Read more]

Also, just realized something. The number on the bottom corner of mine was the number I was given for iConfidant (8945).

@daela: She seemed pretty genuine to me and I was shocked by just how friendly she was. She made sure that I was able to order a drink, was a bit annoyed with how long it took to arrive, and asked if it was to my liking when it…[Read more]

I don’t remember what the envelopes looked like at the Red Door jacking, but the ones @wanda102 and @kevin held up in the periscope are DEFINITELY the same as the one that fell out of Sarah Sinclair’s briefcase at the OC meetup. When we were examining it that night, the wax was too cracked to decipher the OOA logo on the broken seal, but it was…[Read more]

(Psst, @wanda102 – ask to get a photo of her so I can make her into a card)

@joycecarlberg, you got a good one with that tall drink of water @wanda102

Keep your eye on @bcbishop though.

Congrats all!

Awesome, so that’s @wanda102, @kevin, and @bcbishop. Have a nice chat tomorrow, you guys!

Thanks for the chance, @joycecarlberg! 🙂

Have a good time @bcbishop @kevin and @wanda102!!

Awesome @wanda102! I think that’s my cue that I’m likely *not* meeting her tomorrow so I’m heading to bed now.

I simply can’t decide whom to chose.  So, @chloe, @kevin, @bcbishop, @kortneydarling, @wanda102, @mumumusings, @mkarrett, @coryphella, and @meghanmayhem – let’s all pick a number between 1 and 10 in the next hour. The three who are the closest will have a shared tête-à-tête with me tomorrow.

Fair?

Great, now go.

I simply can’t decide whom to chose.  So, @chloe, @kevin, @bcbishop, @kortneydarling, @wanda102, @mumumusings, @mkarrett, @coryphella, and @meghanmayhem – let’s all pick a number between 1 and 10 in the next hour. The two who are the very closest will have a shared tête-à-tête with me tomorrow.

Fair?

Great, now go.

@thebuz Nope.
@kasch, “Silly” Andrew, never in a million years.
@theladyj, I think not.
@sfire8 and @goldtongue, does not compute.
@lukasrl, Uh-Uh.
@izryn, you still have a lot to LEARNT.
@shankfx22, N.O.
@thegilded, too far this time, love.
@daela, maybe next time.
@superstar, look elsewhere for help.
@kipsie, injection attack of not going to…[Read more]

@wanda102, ok, he didn’t even sound “for real” angry to me…just truthful. But what do I know? I do agree, this is what Joyce wants, though…

@wanda102, huh? Wow we read @thebuz‘s resoonse totally different. No offense, but I thought he was totally telling the truth and rooting for the little guys, not puffing up with fake anger to get a rise at all? But then again, I don’t know him that well… but now I’m playing into the chatter right? This is hard.

@wanda102 Or is this just a different side of the Fluffernutter coin?

“Stop worrying, and just give into this frivolities.”

vs.

“These things that seem like a good time? They’ll KILL YOU.”

It strikes me that the way @joycecarlberg talks about things echoes the 6.23 Mystery Caller pretty accurately – but these sentiments encouraging us to invest in this “thing,” whatever it may be, actually seem to be pretty different from the conversation @rizzzoooooo and @wanda102 had with Fluffernutter.

We’d loosely assumed that Fluffernutter was…[Read more]