Cristen

Horace seems really interested in poking that erratic and unstable bear. This should be entertaining.

So what we can take from this is that Horace is at least claiming that A. he doesn’t give a fuck what happened to Joyce, and B. He doesn’t give a fuck about Mason/Michelle and isn’t afraid of them?

@bcbishop now that you lay it out like that it does seem like the participants yesterday were a calculated coincidence. If so, that’s pretty fucking low, Mason. We’re the last people who’d want her hurt, but not the only people.

@emilyj he didn’t ask me to do anything weird, no. He did smell me as you saw at one point, which honestly I was expecting and was nonplussed by.

This seems so contrary to the Morgan I know that I have to assume…or hope, that Mason is operating outside of what Morgan wants.

Oh Christ, @bcbishop…if you’re right, we are being expertly puppeted. And all the world is a fucking stage.

It really feels like he’s got two disparate personalities, both dovetailing into a similar goal, however. @mike you may actually be onto something there, ha. Maybe when OSDM tries to shoehorn him back into the narrative to put us back in out happy “fiction,” he gets a little…unstable.

Well if @kevin‘s Mason is wondering why people don’t believe him, perhaps he’d care to explain @coryphella‘s Mason call to us?

Dang that’s a convenient rebuttal to a lot of good theories from today. What do we know besides we don’t know nothing?

@nothenrygale No one is arguing the intention behind his mission statement; we all support the strength of his beliefs. He specifically said he was going to “burn the OSDM to the ground” in the video you refer to. That is not to say his goals cant pivot, as @kevin said, but he most certainly indicated what, again with the information we had at…[Read more]

@remrelganaps lets think simpler than that though: The Creators posted here that everything was under control to convince us that everything Mason said and did was by their design, when they knew it was not. Based on the leaks and what we’ve seen with our actor friends being bugged, and the panic in various communications between Darren and co,…[Read more]

@remrelganaps I suppose we’re led to assume he is real because he appeared and it threw Clint and Darren into a panic and they took steps within their narrative to try and convince us he, and his info, wasn’t real.

Thanks for this, Kevin. I wanted to follow up with the idea the Joyce was put into play by TPTB as a frantic effort to make Mason seem like part of the narrative by having her discuss him.

I’s also venture that since Mason is mentioning HiB’s info, while she may not be real in the sense that she’s an actual person (could be Mason behind the…[Read more]

Brought from slack:

If we are assuming that Mason is real, as our Creators suspect, then I have also heard a few people saying that maybe everything before Mason was curated fiction. That would mean OSDM as we know it is fiction, and that BOS as we know it was created to burn down something that doesn’t exist. That could explain why Mason hasn’t…[Read more]

Need to note here that Rembrandts painting is the men at the table with the swords in the background of this painting, which is Gustav IIIs Visit to the Royal Academy of Arts by Elias Martin. So it’s worth discussing why the Lust logo is on the Claudius scene, being observed by the characters in the foreground.

Note from Tacitus on Civilius:

The painting follows Tacitus’s Histories in depicting an episode from the Batavian rebellion (69–70 AD), led by the one-eyed chieftain Claudius Civilis in which he “collected at one of the sacred groves, ostensibly for a banquet, the chiefs of the nation and the boldest spirits of the lower class”, convinced them t…[Read more]

Maybe this is the text that led to the call he had with Clint?

Jesus that’s heavy. Worth noting also that when Steph called me on HIB day she also called from her own number, likely for the same reason: no ambiguity, I guess.