Megan

Also, @lukasrl – my plan for 2018 has been to begin designing an ARG/theater hybrid piece, not as ambitious as Tension/Lust but something that would bridge a couple of cities I have collaborators in. And the idea with that has been to have a VERY loose story from the start that is affected every step of the way by the participants’ choices. Yes,…[Read more]

Yup, what Lukas said. And TPTB have repeatedly said that our actions and choices have consequences. I think this is (and should be) a situation where we DO affect these people’s lives – it’s not Sleep No More. We can change the narrative, not by being assholes but by making choices or missing opportunities or seizing them or making them, the way…[Read more]

If it’s a good narrative and a good ARG, they ARE affected by us. That’s the point. If a plot point has to be carried out then they’ll find a way, otherwise our choices should have consequences. Remember they want us to be active here, not passive observers.

Remember to, this is exactly what led initially to the creation of the first Slack group last year – we wanted to talk about the OOA without having a space where the OOA read everything. Obviously we eventually understood why that was problematic and it’s understandable here too, but it’s still an odd game mechanic. @thegilded – I am pretty sure…[Read more]

Wait I’m really confused…people mentioned tom’s post but I don’t see it.

ETA: never mind found it!

Wait I’m really confused…people mentioned tom’s post but I don’t see it?

Is that the address of the bar where y’all were at?

I honestly don’t understand “sides” at this point. Why does anyone think there are sides that need taking? I get it last year – we were told that a war was coming. We were shown the sides. Were were told to pick them. And maybe it will come to that. Or maybe y’all are wicked jumping the gun (Texas and New Hampshire in one sentence). It’s a…[Read more]

Lucky she is not a government employee but still puts things in perspective.

Yeah, and that perspective is “sucks to work for the government.”

The Sinclairs smacked me down IMMEDIATELY – and then proceeded to never send me a single email after that. Not a press release, not a response to a follow-up, nothing. Also I appreciated the personalized smackdown quite a bit.

Stacey called me personally, out of the blue, before anyone knew about iConfidant. So, I feel as if, if there is a path,…[Read more]

I got the safeword and immediately wanted to say “bull. shit. that’s a really loaded safeword and a bunch of crap, I am NOT going to say that. I would rather say ‘pineapple.'”

I don’t think I’ve seen that episode…and it was from back when I actually watched that show.
I’m always going to hope we’re going for “tiny bit more terrifying.”

@rizzzoooooo – LOL I missed the part where they CALLED BACK to tell you that!! Yeah I remember everyone freaking the fuck out. 🙂

@theladyj – oh it absolutely would be – but remember when this started, with that questionnaire (I started April 6 last year), we had no idea who was behind it. It could have been anyone that we were trusting all that info to, blindly. And I remember at one point they briefly threatened to release @rizzzoooooo‘s questionnaire to the public, and…[Read more]

@theladyj – they (Tension) absolutely can get me fired. 🙂 I trust them not to.

With Tension/Lust, I share as much as I can. My social media accounts and public contact info are VERY public online, as is my husband’s, and have been for years, so I know I’m accessible. What I am looking for in this…I can only get if I allow myself to be vulnerable and honest, if it’s even possible, so not allowing them in would defeat the…[Read more]