Tagged: iConfidant, investors, Joyce, osdm
This topic has 21 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by Megan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
June 28, 2017 at 3:58 pm #18124CristenParticipant
I wanted to get a separate thread started here on the content of myself @kevin and @bcbishop’s letter last night. @joycecarlberg had hinted after the fact that maybe something is hidden in plain sight in these letters.
Kevin, if you don’t mind reposting them again here I’d appreciate it!
We now know those numbers in the bottom right at least in part are our individual iconfidant numbers. Why? Are they case files, etc, as Kevin suggested?
Or is Joyce just toying with us to get us to overthink this, dial in on it, and this continue to communicate and interact within The Experience? If so…clever girl.
Sound off.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:02 pm #18125
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:03 pm #18126KevinParticipant
From an earlier discussion on Slack:
The one unaccounted thing is for what’s after the iConfidant number. Mine has a “-L”, Cristen’s has a “-b3”, and it looks like Bryan’s has a “-L” as well.
And here’s a link to the Google doc we were using to keep track of everyone’s iConfidant numbers. If anyone isn’t on there or your number isn’t on there, feel free to add it in.
- This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Kevin.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:07 pm #18127Hannah SchenckParticipant
Not sure what the L stands for (I did some extensive research in L classifications and came up empty handed, the same goes for b3) but perhaps B3= beta 3
Maybe it stands for a level of testing or group categorizing
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:12 pm #18129AnonymousInactive
@kevin Can you post your google doc of iConfidant numbers? *EDIT HE ALREADY DID ABOVE!*
In organizing things, your letter is the category you’re looking in and the number is the specific thing in that category.
So in this instance @wanda102 could potentially be “Beta 3” as @shankfx22 pointed out.
That all being said… not everyone got a letter… and on the letters the “letter” comes after the number.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:20 pm #18131Bryan BishopParticipant
@kevin For the sake of completeness, here’s my letter and envelope. If we’re looking for differences that are hiding out in the open, how’s this for a crazy one: it appears that not all the letters were folded the same way. (????)
Front:
Back:
Seal:
Letter:
Text:
iConfidant Number:
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:20 pm #18132Hannah SchenckParticipant
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:26 pm #18133CristenParticipant
Differences off the top of my head:
Human female
Did not participate in Tension
Did attend Focus Group
Didn’t receive a “yes” “no” or “maybe” System response initially (what did you guys get?)
Had dessert with Fluff -
June 28, 2017 at 4:28 pm #18134Brad RuweParticipant
Most obvious difference to me is not participating in Tension. There was mention that the core that did Tension was a sort of control group correct? Think this the key for the grouping?
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:30 pm #18135AnonymousInactive
I will say this…
Thought about it and I’m starting to think that there is absolutely nothing to those letters beyond their content. That she wrote what she did to stir the pot and gather… wait for it… counter intelligence.
To quote Van Jones, this is all just a big Nothing Burger.
She’s doing exactly what she said she was going to do. She’s testing us. Gauging our response time, how we react to frustration.
She gave us a small taste to connect to (the iConfidant numbers) and is laughing as we scramble to connect them.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:31 pm #18136KevinParticipant
@wanda102 @nothenrygale I initially received no response from The System and sent a second email that garnered one, where I was prompted to send them my info. I went through Ascension twice, but didn’t participate in Indoctrination at all.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:33 pm #18137CristenParticipant
Like I said @thebuz, clever girl.
-
June 28, 2017 at 4:35 pm #18138Hannah SchenckParticipant
@thebuz It’s almost as if a dollar was tied to a fishing wire, laid out for us to see, and is slowly being pulled just out of reach as we chase it; blind to the string and the person in the bushes who is so very entertained… oh hey @joycecarlberg
- This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Hannah Schenck.
-
June 28, 2017 at 5:59 pm #18141MeganParticipant
The 3 options that result from “wind the clock” sound an awful lot like descriptions of heaven, hell, and purgatory.
-
June 28, 2017 at 6:23 pm #18142Lauren BelloModerator
The 3 options that result from “wind the clock” sound an awful lot like descriptions of heaven, hell, and purgatory.
Oh, interesting.
“Some may find a state of uncontrollable euphoria and perfection, others may face a great reckoning in which the pain of their mistakes and wrongdoings have come back to tear them and everything they love apart from the inside for all eternity, and still others may find it nothing more than another tick of a second hand on a now functioning clock.”
Nice call @coryphella
-
-
June 28, 2017 at 6:34 pm #18143AnonymousInactive
@coryphella Great observation!!
Chock this up with the other numerous Biblical references being dropped on us.
-
June 28, 2017 at 6:35 pm #18144JackieParticipant
The 3 options that result from “wind the clock” sound an awful lot like descriptions of heaven, hell, and purgatory.//“Some may find a state of uncontrollable euphoria and perfection, others may face a great reckoning in which the pain of their mistakes and wrongdoings have come back to tear them and everything they love apart from the inside for all eternity, and still others may find it nothing more than another tick of a second hand on a now functioning clock.”
Also it came across to me as very similar, but also like: reward for true believers, punishment for believers who didn’t preform adequately, and a daily nuance for those who never believed/noticed/invested at all.
Where does one fall once the clock is wound? Did you care at all, not enough, or not well-enough.
-
June 28, 2017 at 6:43 pm #18145Bryan BishopParticipant
Damn, @coryphella, nice catch.
I guess the question now becomes why they echo heaven, hell, and purgatory. Is it because there’s an actual religious connection here — or is it because The OSDM (and HCDI) know that those three states will resonate with people on an instinctual level? They’re nothing if not masters of preying upon our existing tendencies and patterns of behavior.
-
June 28, 2017 at 6:48 pm #18146MeganParticipant
Us: “Maybe we’re all stuck in purgatory”
@joycecarlberg: “Nope not purgatory”(cut to 6 years later)
@joycecarlberg: “Well of course it was purgatory the whole time was I supposed to just TELL YOU?” -
June 28, 2017 at 7:42 pm #18147AnonymousInactive
Us: “Maybe we’re all stuck in purgatory”
@joycecarlberg: “Nope not purgatory”(cut to 6 years later)
@joycecarlberg: “Well of course it was purgatory the whole time was I supposed to just TELL YOU?”You wanna talk about abusive relationships, that’s how I feel about Lindeloff and Cruse. Fuckers.
-
June 28, 2017 at 7:56 pm #18148MeganParticipant
@thebuz – aww, I love them. Sorry. 🙂 And The Leftovers was brilliant.
-
June 28, 2017 at 8:44 pm #18152MeganParticipant
OK, given @thebuz’s call, back to the letters – I wanted to pull out this section:
The true key to understanding this particular phrase is to keep ruminating on it as often as possible until the answer comes to you. Don’t be alarmed if it takes more time than you wish; it only means that you should focus on it harder.
Some may find that continually repeating the phrase out loud, writing it down in familiar places where it is easy to be reminded of or doing a combination of both will speed up the time it takes for the answer to appear for you.
It just struck me – is it possible there’s a message here that we should be looking harder at these words, perhaps even following these instructions somehow to uncover a meaning we haven’t found yet?
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.