Future Humans – Based on 3/30 meeting

[Kyle Bown]

@julierei Mentioned the woman had this magazine/article on her:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/11/091124-origin-of-species-150-darwin-human-evolution.html

FUTURE HUMANS: Four Ways We May, or May Not, Evolve

November, 2009

=====
Basically, it’s an article discussing the four ways humans may evolve in the future.

1. They won’t. human evolution is dead because there is interbreeding and no isolated populations.
2. We continue to do so naturally through sexual selection, viruses, etc.
3. We do, but it’s through electronic augmentation, genetic manipulation, etc.
4. We do but it’s from isolated populations in off-world colonies.

I feel like 3 is the most interesting of these for humanity in this moment. 1 is kind of pointless, 2 is not really anything we can affect and 4 is a bit too far off.

Thoughts?

[Anonymous]

Well… we do know that they have a neat buzzy helmet that does fun things to human brains…

[Alejandra Acosta]

As someone else already said, 3 would make sense with a shadow theory. Also because they’ve been taking our data.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 7 months ago by Alejandra Acosta.

[Author]

Posts