August 7, 2017 at 10:21 am #21582Sarah MusnickyParticipant
@thebuz I’ll be impressed when I have had coffee and stop wondering why they didn’t have safety nets to go alongside said booby traps…August 7, 2017 at 10:31 am #21585Andrew KaschParticipant
“You are all so conspiracy minded…”
Whatever could’ve put that in our heads?August 7, 2017 at 10:50 am #21587CassandraParticipant
This is not a narrative hiccup. That is some BS.August 7, 2017 at 11:05 am #21592Michael RizzoParticipant
I wouldn’t so much say this is IT @addisonborn. I just woke up so forgive me if I’m totally wrecking this but IT=MyChild, correct? Inwhich case I wouldn’t see why IT would be the software they use for storyline reveals. That plus I’m fairly certain this ain’t just come software going haywireAugust 7, 2017 at 11:07 am #21594Lawrence MeyersParticipant
I think my crisis management fees just went up.August 7, 2017 at 11:11 am #21595AddisonParticipant
@rizzzoooooo I thought IT was the AI developed alongside iConfidant, and what they were replacing the creators with? And MyChild was a different beast.. I may be completely misremembering, don’t have notes in front of me at the moment.August 7, 2017 at 11:14 am #21596Brad RuweParticipant
My take was that IT was the original AI. Developed by Stacey, modified by The Investors to replace DLB and CS. MyChild if I understand it correctly was the next stage of development Stacey made on it to get revenge on The Investors.August 7, 2017 at 11:30 am #21597Julie R GoldsteinParticipant
There is no narrative. There is only Anoch.August 7, 2017 at 11:30 am #21598Twan IntarathuchParticipant
If there’s nothing to hide, no danger to the audience, then there’s no reason to delete anything.August 7, 2017 at 11:31 am #21599Bryan BishopParticipant
I don’t have all the source links handy, but I believe the reveal was that IT was the original AI from Stacey, as @nothenrygale points out. The shadow accounts on the forums were test runs to see if it could impersonate community members. The next step was going to be for IT to replace Noah Sinclair, which is what prompted his freakout.
After everybody’s motives became clear, however, Stacey turned it into MyChild, and embedded it into the forums (and, it’s been inferred, other OSDM systems).
My gut is that IT/MyChild isn’t behind the HiB because it’s not openly adopting the personality of somebody that we know. Instead, HiB is a secret account. MyChild accounts wouldn’t need to be kept secret, because impersonation is one of its strengths.August 7, 2017 at 11:46 am #21600Michael RizzoParticipant
Yes yes, looking back now you guys are right. MyChild was the next stage of that program after being tweaked by Stacey. And I have to agree with @bcbishop, guy is telling me this is no software… this is a someone and not a something.August 7, 2017 at 11:48 am #21601SeanModerator
Update from Hostess in Black:
15 minutes. I may not have material to sink the ship, but we both know I have enough to fill it a ton of holes and knock it on its side.
— Hostess In Black (@Hostessinblack) August 7, 2017August 7, 2017 at 11:49 am #21602August 7, 2017 at 11:57 am #21604Bryan BishopParticipant
So… a certain small dog lover is now following the Hostess in Black Twitter account. Link right here.August 7, 2017 at 12:00 pm #21605
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.