Update on Site

This topic contains 37 replies, has 19 voices, and was last updated by  Julie R Goldstein 4 months, 1 week ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #21566
     TheController 
    Keymaster

    This morning, there was a hiccup within the narrative. We have a lot of storylines that are on timed releases. Accidentally, one of our characters Hostess In Black moved ahead earlier than intended. (next chapter).

    Once this happened it launched a series of events we quickly tried to rectify by deleting posts and hiding this narrative thread.

    You are all so conspiracy minded that you jumped onto this rapidly, and it snowballed out of control.

    Please note for the next 24 hours we will be doing updated maintenance and may be removing a few posts here and there to maintain the integrity of our narrative.

    Thank you for your understanding.

  • #21568
     Kevin 
    Participant

    Do you have any information on the Hostess In Black Twitter account which seems to contradict what you’re saying here?

  • #21569
     Bryan Bishop 
    Participant

    You’re sounding an awful lot like Dr. Ford in this post, @thecontroller. Did a fly unexpectedly land on Hostess in Black?

  • #21570
     Brad Ruwe 
    Participant

    If this is the case, why is the Twitter account still rolling? If this was just a simple character in your narrative, why is she still going off in a place you can’t “control” the narrative? Something doesn’t match up here.

  • #21571
     Anonymous

    What @kevin said…@thecontroller the Hostess in Black started calling us out for deleting things, but that was your effort to control an accidental release of a character? Seems a bit problematic…

  • #21572
     Addison 
    Participant

    So hold up. This is getting brushed off by insinuating that HiB is IT, and just had a glitch?

  • #21573
     Anonymous

    Also blaming us for it snowballing is an excellent way of saying that you fucked up. Deflection tends to signify that.

  • #21574
     Anonymous

    @addisonborn Indeed…

  • #21575
     Kyle Bown 
    Participant

    Your “storyline” doesn’t seem to agree @thecontroller. Good luck though.

  • #21576
     Crystal 
    Participant

    Oh, neat. “Everything is fine” and it’s our fault.

    Cool gaslighting, brosdm.

  • #21577
     Lukas L 
    Participant

    @thecontroller thank you. I enjoy the shadows from the firelight far more than what ever we see when we exit this cave.

  • #21578
     Sean 
    Moderator

    What maintenance would be required…? Any time that a disgruntled real person with actual insider information mistimed scheduled release has come up before, much less severe methods were taken to silence them.

  • #21579
     Hannah Schenck 
    Participant

    So why bring in Stephanie then? If it was a narrative hiccup, why call another actress to bury the Hostess in Black? This does not add up…

  • #21580
     Buz Wallick 
    Moderator

    Is no one else impressed that they have a series of Indiana Jones type booby traps that can be tripped and set off a chain of events and interactions? That’s some damn cool sophisticated storytelling devices.

  • #21581
     Anonymous

    @thecontroller Now I am curious to see how this censorship goes moving forward. 🙂

  • #21582
     Anonymous

    @thebuz I’ll be impressed when I have had coffee and stop wondering why they didn’t have safety nets to go alongside said booby traps…

  • #21585
     Andrew Kasch 
    Participant

    “You are all so conspiracy minded…”

    Whatever could’ve put that in our heads?

  • #21587
     Cassandra 
    Participant

    Gaslighting!

    This is not a narrative hiccup. That is some BS.

  • #21592
     Michael Rizzo 
    Participant

    I wouldn’t so much say this is IT @addisonborn. I just woke up so forgive me if I’m totally wrecking this but IT=MyChild, correct? Inwhich case I wouldn’t see why IT would be the software they use for storyline reveals. That plus I’m fairly certain this ain’t just come software going haywire

    • #21595
       Addison 
      Participant

      @rizzzoooooo I thought IT was the AI developed alongside iConfidant, and what they were replacing the creators with? And MyChild was a different beast.. I may be completely misremembering, don’t have notes in front of me at the moment.

  • #21594
     Lawrence Meyers 
    Participant

    I think my crisis management fees just went up.

  • #21596
     Brad Ruwe 
    Participant

    My take was that IT was the original AI. Developed by Stacey, modified by The Investors to replace DLB and CS. MyChild if I understand it correctly was the next stage of development Stacey made on it to get revenge on The Investors.

  • #21597
     Julie R Goldstein 
    Participant

    There is no narrative. There is only Anoch.

  • #21598
     Twan Intarathuch 
    Participant

    @thecontroller
    If there’s nothing to hide, no danger to the audience, then there’s no reason to delete anything.

  • #21599
     Bryan Bishop 
    Participant

    I don’t have all the source links handy, but I believe the reveal was that IT was the original AI from Stacey, as @nothenrygale points out. The shadow accounts on the forums were test runs to see if it could impersonate community members. The next step was going to be for IT to replace Noah Sinclair, which is what prompted his freakout.

    After everybody’s motives became clear, however, Stacey turned it into MyChild, and embedded it into the forums (and, it’s been inferred, other OSDM systems).

    My gut is that IT/MyChild isn’t behind the HiB because it’s not openly adopting the personality of somebody that we know. Instead, HiB is a secret account. MyChild accounts wouldn’t need to be kept secret, because impersonation is one of its strengths.

  • #21600
     Michael Rizzo 
    Participant

    Yes yes, looking back now you guys are right. MyChild was the next stage of that program after being tweaked by Stacey. And I have to agree with @bcbishop, guy is telling me this is no software… this is a someone and not a something.

  • #21601
     Sean 
    Moderator
  • #21602
     Kyle Bown 
    Participant

    You beat me to it.

    Can’t wait!

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by  Kyle Bown.
  • #21604
     Bryan Bishop 
    Participant

    So… a certain small dog lover is now following the Hostess in Black Twitter account. Link right here.

  • #21605
     Crystal 
    Participant
  • #21607
     Andrew Kasch 
    Participant

    Who could this person be? I’m willing to bet it’s not @111error as that would be too obvious.

    Hmmm…

  • #21609
     Chloe 
    Participant

    All I know is that it will most likely blow our minds once Hostess reveals.

  • #21611
     Bryan Bishop 
    Participant

    After noticing SDL was following the Hostess account, I asked him what was up. His response:

  • #21616
     Julie R Goldstein 
    Participant

    Clint has been compromised. Disengage!

  • #21631
     Crystal 
    Participant

    Oh hello.

  • #21632
     Bryan Bishop 
    Participant

    I’ve got zero analysis or take on what’s happening right now. Just more of the Twitter convo update.

    None of this makes sense.

  • #21653
     Michael Rizzo 
    Participant

    “48 hour retreat”?? Sususususus

  • #21819
     Julie R Goldstein 
    Participant

    Sorry @thecontroller, this isn’t something you can just walk away from. HiB may have given us a cover story before disappearing, but if she wasn’t actually revealing your little secrets, you wouldn’t have used Clint or Stephanie as pawns in your little games and you most certainly wouldn’t have taken your oh-so-valuable time to come here and force feed us horse shit.

    You want to try and frame me? Well then consider yourself officially On Notice!

    GLORY BE!

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

©2017 The LUST Experience | Brought to you by the makers of The TENSION Experience |  Privacy Policy.

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account

Skip to toolbar